Hi
is there a memory limit for the memcached process ? i want to run it
with -m 4096 option , is that possible ?
can anybody tell me how we can decrease the RAM size of MemCached
On Friday, 20 March 2009 12:14:25 UTC+5:30, skyhopper wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> is there a memory limit for the memcached process ? i want to run it
> with -m 4096 option , is that possible ?
--
---
You received this message becau
On Mar 19, 11:44 pm, skyhopper wrote:
> is there a memory limit for the memcached process ? i want to run it
> with -m 4096 option , is that possible ?
What happens when you try?
actually ..i wanted to procure more ram. but someone just said that it
doesn't allow more than 2 gig. thats why i wanted to confirm. right now i am
on a 2 gig machine. but want to run memcached with 4 gigs of ram
thanks
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Dustin wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 19, 11:44 pm
Well if the machine had 4gb of ram, I wouldn't use 4096 for the -m option.
As I am sure that the OS and other bits are probably using some memory
there. I'd do 3800 or something, but depends on what else is being used on
that server.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Sudipta Banerjee <
sudipta.ba
it has 8 gigs of ram and its 64 bit
its going to be dedicated to memcached
thanks
sudipta
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Clint Webb wrote:
> Well if the machine had 4gb of ram, I wouldn't use 4096 for the -m option.
> As I am sure that the OS and other bits are probably using some memory
>
On Mar 20, 2009, at 8:10 AM, Sudipta Banerjee wrote:
it has 8 gigs of ram and its 64 bit
Compile memcached as a 64bit binary and you should be able to use as
much memory as you want (I have tested with up to 30Gb)... Please note
that memcached use more memory than the memory specified w
By the way, has anyone already tried to quantify in a *more
scientific* manner the actual extra memory we should let on a box to
be sure memcached won't swap ?
I guess memcached related overhead should be proportional to the
expected number of connection and their traffic. I guess this is about
t
It's at least "a couple megs". It depends on how many parallel connections
you have, and the typical size of your read buffers.
If you do a lot of large multi-gets, you'll use more ram than otherwise.
Future releases will probably track this memory more closely? It's not
hard to do.
-Dormando
On
