pulling it into the tree, since
> > that implies we have to maintain it.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 27 Aug 2010, KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> > > BTW, how about getting inclusion of this patch?
> >
> > > (2010/08/16 14:38), KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> > &
>
> > (2010/08/16 14:38), KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> > > The attached patch is a revised version of memcached permissions.
>
> > > The 'calculate' permission has gone, and INCR/DECR requires us
> > > both of 'read' and 'write' permiss
BTW, how about getting inclusion of this patch?
>
> (2010/08/16 14:38), KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> > The attached patch is a revised version of memcached permissions.
> >
> > The 'calculate' permission has gone, and INCR/DECR requires us
> > both of 'read&#x
BTW, how about getting inclusion of this patch?
(2010/08/16 14:38), KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> The attached patch is a revised version of memcached permissions.
>
> The 'calculate' permission has gone, and INCR/DECR requires us
> both of 'read' and 'write'
The attached patch is a revised version of memcached permissions.
The 'calculate' permission has gone, and INCR/DECR requires us
both of 'read' and 'write' permissions.
It means we should switch domain of the client process when we
need special treatments to unac
(2010/08/04 10:25), Kelvin Edmison wrote:
> I'm still not sure how allowing a 'calculate' permission would be helpful in
> this case. Incr and decr allow for incrementing and decrementing by any
> amount. There does not seem to be any real difference between that and
> 'write' to me.
>
INCR and
I'm still not sure how allowing a 'calculate' permission would be helpful in
this case. Incr and decr allow for incrementing and decrementing by any
amount. There does not seem to be any real difference between that and
'write' to me.
If a strict security partitioning is desired, then perhaps a
(2010/07/30 22:55), Kelvin Edmison wrote:
> While I haven't yet read the patch, I would like to understand why there is
> a need for a Calculate permission. Why would someone be granted 'calculate'
> permission but not 'write' permission?
>
> Kelvin
>
The issue depends on individual user's requi
While I haven't yet read the patch, I would like to understand why there is
a need for a Calculate permission. Why would someone be granted 'calculate'
permission but not 'write' permission?
Kelvin
On 30/07/10 12:49 AM, "KaiGai Kohei" wrote:
> I'll mainly submit the patch and message to SELinu
I'll mainly submit the patch and message to SELinux community,
but please don't hesitate to comment anything from memcached
community.
The attached patch adds policies to support access controls
on key-value items managed by memcached with SELinux engine.
Nowadays, various kind of key-va
10 matches
Mail list logo
