Hello JC and al.,
will your fixed size prefix patch (per prefix detailed statistics) be
finally merged into mainline ?
Thanks.
Regards,
Didier.
On 24 juil, 11:37, JC wrote:
> By the way, is this patch going to be integrated in the mainline?
> I mean, I would understand the whole feature to
By the way, is this patch going to be integrated in the mainline?
I mean, I would understand the whole feature to be kicked out but if
it kept in the official version, the opimized way to do things sounds
better, no?
cheers,
Jean-Charles
On Jun 1, 8:57 pm, Trond Norbye wrote:
> On Jun 1, 2009,
On Jun 1, 2009, at 6:53 PM, Jean-Charles Redoutey wrote:
I kind of feel lonely on my topic ;-)
Anyway, still in the same area, I've made prefix stats collection
use the same pattern with per thread statistics and global
aggregation on request. Those stats overhead shall then not be more
I kind of feel lonely on my topic ;-)
Anyway, still in the same area, I've made prefix stats collection use the
same pattern with per thread statistics and global aggregation on request.
Those stats overhead shall then not be more than the other ones.
Which by the way lead me to a question:
Is it r
I have also added the bytes in/out for data content per prefix.
cheers,
---
Jean-Charles
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 18:26, Jean-Charles Redoutey
wrote:
> Hi evreyone,
>
> I just found out the "stats detail" command, which is not far from a point
> I raised some time ago about more detailed statisti
Hi evreyone,
I just found out the "stats detail" command, which is not far from a point I
raised some time ago about more detailed statistics :-)
However, in my use, the keys are using a fixed size prefix without delimiter
so the -D option is pretty useless :-(
So I have just added in what I hope
