Yes that is the point - I need an area to store a hash outside of my plack
cycle. Local hashes get overwritten because plack spawns a new child
through each cycle.
thanks.
On Tuesday, November 24, 2015 at 10:29:17 AM UTC-7, perrin wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Joseph Norris
Many thanks for your response. So my thinking was correct in this way:
process 1 -> set($tag1,$hash);data unique to process 1
process 1 -> get($tag1,$hash);
process 2 -> set ($tag2,$hash); data unique to process 2
process 2 -> get($tag2,$hash);
each process must have a unique key to
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Joseph Norris wrote:
> process 1 -> set($tag1,$hash);data unique to process 1
> process 1 -> get($tag1,$hash);
> process 2 -> set ($tag2,$hash); data unique to process 2
> process 2 -> get($tag2,$hash);
>
I'm not sure what you're
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Joseph Norris wrote:
> if I set a tag to a value of a hash:
>
> $self->{cache}->set('tag',$hash);
>
> is the hash ref set in memcache that will point back to my hash or do I
> have to actually have a %hash to be used in
>
Very new to memcache.
in my application I am using Cache::Memcached. My questions are:
if I set a tag to a value of a hash:
$self->{cache}->set('tag',$hash);
is the hash ref set in memcache that will point back to my hash or do I
have to actually have a %hash to be used in