The 4004 was a good chip for 1971. There were others, but the 4004 was adopted
by NASA I believe for hand held calculators, and being made in large quantities
(for the time) and not a proprietary military chip, became the basis for a lot
of early small computers. Mainframes at the time had a
Intel's CPU architecture is too complex. Endless security problems such as
Meltdown, Spectre, Rowhammer, with no good mitigations that don't cripple
performance. More to come for sure.
ARM64 in higher core counts is the next wave. Apple's M1 processor is the first
really mainstream example.
Yet Intel stock underperforms its peer group...
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021, 11:37 AM OK Don via Mercedes
wrote:
> Yes. the link works. Now I'll read the article.
>
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 9:39 AM Floyd Thursby via Mercedes <
> mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:
>
> > See if this link works, WSJ say it
Yes. the link works. Now I'll read the article.
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 9:39 AM Floyd Thursby via Mercedes <
mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:
> See if this link works, WSJ say it will. Very interesting article
>
>
>
See if this link works, WSJ say it will. Very interesting article
https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-chip-that-changed-the-world-microprocessor-computing-transistor-breakthrough-intel-11636903999?st=hx6g922ishd7qzx=desktopwebshare_permalink
--
--FT
___