[MBZ] [Fwd:] Clunker math]

2009-09-11 Thread Kaleb C. Striplin
from another list Original Message Subject:[db] Clunker math Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 14:48:49 -0700 (PDT) From: diesel john To: undisclosed-recipients: ; got this info from a friend... A vehicle at 15 mpg and 12,000 miles per year uses 800 gallons a year

Re: [MBZ] [Fwd:] Clunker math]

2009-09-11 Thread Allan Streib
Not only that, but with the new car and better mpg, the owner will probably drive more. So even the already negligible savings in oil will be even less. Cash for Clunkers was not about saving oil though. Not really. Allan "Kaleb C. Striplin" writes: > from another list > > Original

Re: [MBZ] [Fwd:] Clunker math]

2009-09-11 Thread OK Don
Right - it never was about oil, or gas - it was about UAW and dealer jobs and propping up "our" auto companies. The better fuel economy aspect was an after-thought. On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Allan Streib wrote: > Cash for Clunkers was not about saving oil though. Not really. > > Allan >

Re: [MBZ] [Fwd:] Clunker math]

2009-09-11 Thread Scott Ritchey
. Striplin Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 20:54 To: Banned List; mercedes Mailing List Subject: [MBZ] [Fwd:] Clunker math] from another list Original Message Subject:[db] Clunker math Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 14:48:49 -0700 (PDT) From: diesel john To: undisclosed

Re: [MBZ] [Fwd:] Clunker math]

2009-09-11 Thread Rich Thomas
And Global Warming, or Climate Change, or CO2 in the air, or something like that, it was going to be all better with the clunkers declunked. --R OK Don wrote: Right - it never was about oil, or gas - it was about UAW and dealer jobs and propping up "our" auto companies. The better fuel economy