Re: [MBZ] [OT] Am I the only one that finds this bone chilling?

2007-01-25 Thread Mitch Haley
"John W. Reames III" wrote: > Yeah. Then theres that pesky 10th amendment... There is no 10th amendment. It was one of the first to go, before I was born. Mitch.

[MBZ] [OT] Am I the only one that finds this bone

2007-01-24 Thread Glenn M. Brown
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available Url: http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com/attachments/20070124/20e2f214/attachment.pl

Re: [MBZ] [OT] Am I the only one that finds this bone chilling?

2007-01-24 Thread LarryT
L PROTECTED]> To: "Mercedes Discussion List" Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 9:44 AM Subject: Re: [MBZ] [OT] Am I the only one that finds this bone chilling? "There is no expressed grant of habeas in the Constitution; there's a prohibition against taking it away,&q

Re: [MBZ] [OT] Am I the only one that finds this bone chilling?

2007-01-24 Thread Lee Einer
John W. Reames III wrote: > On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Allan Streib wrote: >> Well -- um. The actual text from Section 9 of the Constitution is: >> >> The privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, >> unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may >> requir

Re: [MBZ] [OT] Am I the only one that finds this bone chilling?

2007-01-24 Thread John W. Reames III
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Allan Streib wrote: > Well -- um. The actual text from Section 9 of the Constitution is: > > The privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, > unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may > require it. > > So, it sounds to me l

Re: [MBZ] [OT] Am I the only one that finds this bone chilling?

2007-01-24 Thread andrew strasfogel
ty and integrity are foreign concepts in those quarters, all that counts in being in charge and not overseen by anyone. Peter -Original Message- >From: "John W. Reames III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Jan 24, 2007 8:59 AM >To: Mercedes Discussion List >Subject:

Re: [MBZ] [OT] Am I the only one that finds this bone chilling?

2007-01-24 Thread Peter Frederick
"John W. Reames III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Jan 24, 2007 8:59 AM >To: Mercedes Discussion List >Subject: Re: [MBZ] [OT] Am I the only one that finds this bone chilling? > >On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, Werner Fehlauer wrote: > >> John - there's a whole

Re: [MBZ] [OT] Am I the only one that finds this bone chilling?

2007-01-24 Thread Allan Streib
> "There is no expressed grant of habeas in the Constitution; there's > a prohibition against taking it away," Gonzales said. Well -- um. The actual text from Section 9 of the Constitution is: The privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebelli

Re: [MBZ] [OT] Am I the only one that finds this bone chilling?

2007-01-24 Thread John W. Reames III
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, Werner Fehlauer wrote: > John - there's a whole lot of that kind of warped interpretation inside the > beltway. The redeeming factor is that once you get 50 miles away from > there, the common sense factor seems to go way up! *lol* yeah thats because COOP sites for DC can'

Re: [MBZ] [OT] Am I the only one that finds this bone chilling?

2007-01-24 Thread John W. Reames III
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, Lee Einer wrote: > John W. Reames III wrote: > > http://baltimorechronicle.com/2007/011907Parry.shtml > > > > "There is no expressed grant of habeas in the Constitution; there's a > > prohibition against taking it away," Gonzales said. > > > > Don't you LOVE tri-state logic

Re: [MBZ] [OT] Am I the only one that finds this bone chilling?

2007-01-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: not available Url: http://okiebenz.com/pipermail/mercedes_okiebenz.com/attachments/20070124/1c0b66cc/attachment.pl

Re: [MBZ] [OT] Am I the only one that finds this bone chilling?

2007-01-24 Thread Peter Frederick
Which action Gonzales has absolutely no problem with -- he's defended imprisonment without charges many times. All for good reasons, of course. Too much lawyering, I think, he seems to have forgotten how to read English. Peter

Re: [MBZ] [OT] Am I the only one that finds this bone chilling?

2007-01-24 Thread Werner Fehlauer
ECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 8:49 PM Subject: [MBZ] [OT] Am I the only one that finds this bone chilling? http://baltimorechronicle.com/2007/011907Parry.shtml "There is no expressed grant of habeas in the Constitution; there's a prohibition against taking it away,&

Re: [MBZ] [OT] Am I the only one that finds this bone chilling?

2007-01-24 Thread Mitch Haley
Lee Einer wrote: > > Without habeus corpus, any one of us can be hauled off in the dead of > night and "disappeared" for nothing more than having pissed off the > powers that be. You mean like they do in the United States? Gonzales was one of the authors of that policy BTW. Excuse me while I g

Re: [MBZ] [OT] Am I the only one that finds this bone chilling?

2007-01-24 Thread Lee Einer
John W. Reames III wrote: > http://baltimorechronicle.com/2007/011907Parry.shtml > > "There is no expressed grant of habeas in the Constitution; there's a > prohibition against taking it away," Gonzales said. > > Don't you LOVE tri-state logic? No. I don't. Habeus Corpus is a right which was es

[MBZ] [OT] Am I the only one that finds this bone chilling?

2007-01-24 Thread John W. Reames III
http://baltimorechronicle.com/2007/011907Parry.shtml "There is no expressed grant of habeas in the Constitution; there's a prohibition against taking it away," Gonzales said. Don't you LOVE tri-state logic? -j.