> ...Hey Roger, are W203s any good?
> http://atlanta.craigslist.org/eat/ctd/2762385631.html..
>
2006 and later are OK. This 2001 C320 is not worth buying at any price,
having owned nearly the same thing for 6.5 years and wrung the warranty dry
keeping it on the road.
RLE
>
>
___
why do you need pad lube? Do those new cheap class cars require it?
Cant you just get some at the local mcparts?
dude .come on man
You don't need pad lube, the brakes have anti squeal shims built in. You
only need lube if you buy cheap pads.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 1:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
why do you need pad lube? Do those new cheap class cars require it?
Cant you just get some at the local mcparts?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pads and sensors ordered last Thursday from Bimby, arrived today. That's the
good news. The not so good is that there is no pad lube included and I was not
Pads and sensors ordered last Thursday from Bimby, arrived today. That's the
good news. The not so good is that there is no pad lube included and I was not
asked if I wanted any. Now I have to drive down to MB to buy some.
I guess I'll reuse the old caliper bolts.
RLE
Much to my surprise the big warning lit up the other day. Brake warning that
is. Crawling under with a mirror and strong light revealed the rear pads have
worn down to the sensors. 43000 miles, guess it's time.
My 201s needed rear pads every 27K miles.
Pads and sensors on the way from bimby. Qu
For those who are always looking for something to criticize about the present
models, here's some ammo. My C320 has developed a fuel leak, or perhaps seep
would be the word for now. I jacked it up today (lifted by the diff) and
searched with a light, finding nothing. The fuel filter, above the l
