Re: [MBZ] DIY not

2009-12-02 Thread Peter Frederick
We lucked out on my brother's SDL (yes, those bend rods too, usually #1) because he broke an exhaust stud off and we had to remove the head to fix it. Actually, the MB dealer's monkeys broke it by grossly overtightening the manifold nuts when they did his trap replacement, but that's not t

Re: [MBZ] DIY not

2009-12-02 Thread Kaleb C. Striplin
Original Message- From: Jim Cathey Sent: Dec 2, 2009 1:12 AM To: Mercedes Discussion List Subject: Re: [MBZ] DIY not Not everything booth said was always 100% correct. I bet I can slap a good used piston in, replace the one rod and be good to go. Somebody on this list replace

Re: [MBZ] DIY not

2009-12-02 Thread dave walton
Yes. The new gasket is reinforced in that area. -Dave Walton On 12/2/09, John Robbins wrote: > Peter Frederick wrote: > > > I personally think the rod bending problem is only partially the > > rods. I've had the head off three of these things recently, and in > > every case there is some eviden

Re: [MBZ] DIY not

2009-12-02 Thread John Robbins
Peter Frederick wrote: I personally think the rod bending problem is only partially the rods. I've had the head off three of these things recently, and in every case there is some evidence of excessive oil in #1. There is a known failure mode of the head gasket at the oil passage across the fro

Re: [MBZ] DIY not

2009-12-02 Thread Peter Frederick
ve to be restored to factory specs, which are tighter than most automotive repair shops are used to. A diesel shop will do it right every time, all diesels are like that. Peter -Original Message- >From: Jim Cathey >Sent: Dec 2, 2009 1:12 AM >To: Mercedes Discussion List >

Re: [MBZ] DIY not

2009-12-02 Thread Peter Frederick
last any longer. Same reasons, for that matter. Peter -Original Message----- >From: Mitch Haley >Sent: Dec 2, 2009 8:59 AM >To: Mercedes Discussion List >Subject: Re: [MBZ] DIY not > >What I fear is that if he does the sleeve and piston,

Re: [MBZ] DIY not

2009-12-02 Thread Mitch Haley
What I fear is that if he does the sleeve and piston, he'll end up with an expensive repair that fails in 20-50k like most all of the non factory rebuilt 350s have. Mitch. ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com To search li

Re: [MBZ] DIY not

2009-12-02 Thread Donald Snook
Kaleb wrote: "Not everything booth said was always 100% correct. I bet I can slap a good used piston in, replace the one rod and be good to go. Somebody on this list replace their bent #1 rod only and have not had a bit of trouble." I agree with that. He did seem to have some data to back up h

Re: [MBZ] DIY not

2009-12-01 Thread Jim Cathey
Not everything booth said was always 100% correct. I bet I can slap a good used piston in, replace the one rod and be good to go. Somebody on this list replace their bent #1 rod only and have not had a bit of trouble. You are probably right, especially if you're not planning to get another 2

Re: [MBZ] DIY not

2009-12-01 Thread Mitch Haley
Kaleb C. Striplin wrote: Not everything booth said was always 100% correct. I bet I can slap a good used piston in, replace the one rod and be good to go. New rings no matter what else you do, OK? Mitch. ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used parts

Re: [MBZ] DIY not

2009-12-01 Thread Bob Rentfro
BLASPHEMER!!! Bob R On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Kaleb C. Striplin wrote: > Not everything booth said was always 100% correct. I bet I can slap a good > used piston in, replace the one rod and be good to go. Somebody on this > list replace their bent #1 rod only and have not had a bit o

Re: [MBZ] DIY not

2009-12-01 Thread Kaleb C. Striplin
Not everything booth said was always 100% correct. I bet I can slap a good used piston in, replace the one rod and be good to go. Somebody on this list replace their bent #1 rod only and have not had a bit of trouble. Donald Snook wrote: RLE wrote: "Ya know, even before I was kicked off the

Re: [MBZ] DIY not

2009-12-01 Thread Donald Snook
RLE wrote: "Ya know, even before I was kicked off the Ritter list which was a few years back, it was well known and discussed widely that these engines were designed on the verge of failure and that the only acceptable repair was a factory reman." That's exactly what Dr. Booth used to say. Don

Re: [MBZ] DIY not

2009-11-30 Thread Gary Hurst
i daresay that roger is correct here. it's over for that motor. you aren't going to get this done with some quick and dirty fix. not that i agree with roger, but rather i agree with whoever he stole that idea from. On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:18 AM, wrote: > > ..Kaleb, et al. The piston is no l

Re: [MBZ] DIY not

2009-11-30 Thread RELNGSON
> ..Kaleb, et al. The piston is no longer "round". A lot of pistons are > "Cam ground", sort of oval to accommodate wear perpendicular to the pin. Do > not know if MBZ does this in diesel engines. > Also, the piston is no longer the same weight as the others. Balance you > know. This will make m