Re: [MBZ] Goostepping fer andrew Wuz:Restrictions/fire hazards

2014-03-27 Thread Craig
On Thu, 27 Mar 2014 08:33:31 -0400 "arche...@embarqmail.com" wrote: > Kaleb was the first person I heard use it. Acronyms like WTF should be > no problem, but thinly disguised profanity might since it sounds sh-tty. > Gerry I vote for strict interpretation of Kaleb's statement on this list. Th

Re: [MBZ] Goostepping fer andrew Wuz:Restrictions/fire hazards

2014-03-27 Thread arche...@embarqmail.com
Kaleb was the first person I heard use it. Acronyms like WTF should be no problem, but thinly disguised profanity might since it sounds sh-tty. Gerry On 3/26/2014 11:10 PM, Hendrik and Fay wrote: Are you being serious? Far as I remember WTF has been used around here (and most other non swearin

Re: [MBZ] Goostepping fer andrew Wuz:Restrictions/fire hazards

2014-03-27 Thread Dieselhead
Are you being serious? Far as I remember WTF has been used around here (and most other non swearing forums) for ever. The main purpose of the moderators/admins is to keep the peace and not clamp down on every little thing. Many a time a list member has inadvertently (and not) dropped a bad word

Re: [MBZ] Goostepping fer andrew Wuz:Restrictions/fire hazards

2014-03-26 Thread Hendrik and Fay
Are you being serious? Far as I remember WTF has been used around here (and most other non swearing forums) for ever. The main purpose of the moderators/admins is to keep the peace and not clamp down on every little thing. Many a time a list member has inadvertently (and not) dropped a bad word