Re: [MBZ] OT: Computer Hard Drives eqevesyd

2012-05-21 Thread Mountain Man
Dan wrote: > To grasp this, the Cray-2 required about 200kW of power to operate. IIRC, > there were bus bars in the logic modules that provided 5VDC at around 2,000 > amps! > I got a tour inside the SDI facility at Schriever AFB when it was named Falcon Air Force Station. Originally the inside

Re: [MBZ] OT: Computer Hard Drives eqevesyd

2012-05-21 Thread Gerry Archer
Was the line (power) conditioner checked? Were there storms in the area? When that many units go down close together it makes one wonder about surges, etc. We have similar problems down here in the "lightning capital of the world". When I dealt with such problems 15+ years ago there was no way

Re: [MBZ] OT: Computer Hard Drives eqevesyd

2012-05-21 Thread Dan Penoff
The Cray-2 was. This was the source for a lot of jokes, one of which was to refer to the machine as "Bubbles". To grasp this, the Cray-2 required about 200kW of power to operate. IIRC, there were bus bars in the logic modules that provided 5VDC at around 2,000 amps! Dan On May 21, 2012, at 11:

Re: [MBZ] OT: Computer Hard Drives eqevesyd

2012-05-21 Thread Allan Streib
John Reames writes: > IIRC, Seymour Cray (allegedly) stated that he wasn't a better computer > designer, but that he was a better plumber. Literally... Crays were liquid-cooled, no? Allan -- 1983 300D 1979 300SD ___ http://www.okiebenz.com For new and used

Re: [MBZ] OT: Computer Hard Drives eqevesyd

2012-05-21 Thread Brian Toscano
Maybe Cray was, but those vector processors were pretty bad a$$. On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 9:24 AM, John Reames wrote: > A large part of durability is thermal management. Some companies are > better than others at dealing with heat. > > I know that one manufacturer, if you filled one of their rac

Re: [MBZ] OT: Computer Hard Drives eqevesyd

2012-05-21 Thread John Reames
A large part of durability is thermal management. Some companies are better than others at dealing with heat. I know that one manufacturer, if you filled one of their racks with their blade servers, would exceed 100% failure rate within 180 days. (and that was in a cage at a co-lo data center,

Re: [MBZ] OT: Computer Hard Drives eqevesyd

2012-05-21 Thread Dan Penoff
I would have to believe these were consumer grade drives, as I can't imagine an enterprise grade drive failing in that manner. If that were the case we would all be in major trouble. Dan On May 21, 2012, at 10:32 AM, Allan Streib wrote: > Where I saw it happen it was a small array. Probably

Re: [MBZ] OT: Computer Hard Drives eqevesyd

2012-05-21 Thread Allan Streib
Where I saw it happen it was a small array. Probably built on the cheap (true to "I" in RAID), may not have been using "enterprise" grade drives. We had enough drives fail (something like 5 of 10) in the span of 24 hours that it exceeded the "R" part of RAID, and the array failed. They were al

Re: [MBZ] OT: Computer Hard Drives eqevesyd

2012-05-21 Thread Brian Toscano
Could be a bad lot of drives go into the RAID arrays. The comparison isn't exactly right. Race engines are expected to be rebuilt all the time. Hard drive arrays are supposed to be reliable. Most of the time that reliability means extra redundancy is built into the system in the form of extra d

Re: [MBZ] OT: Computer Hard Drives eqevesyd

2012-05-21 Thread Dan Penoff
Dunno about that, but to follow up, my SANs are set up with 168 drives between two controllers each to fill a standard 48U server rack, to give you an idea of how many drives we're talking about. And that is just one rack. Haven't had but one failure in the last six months. Dan On May 21, 2012

Re: [MBZ] OT: Computer Hard Drives eqevesyd

2012-05-21 Thread Gerry Archer
Could it be that doing physics on drives is far more intense than less complex applications? A comparison might be race cars near their limits (physics) versus ordinary cars being driven far less intensely. From: "OK Don" I haven't seen that either, and we must have thousands of drives by

Re: [MBZ] OT: Computer Hard Drives eqevesyd

2012-05-20 Thread OK Don
I haven't seen that either, and we must have thousands of drives by now. I don't work directly with them anymore, but I'll ask the guys that do tomorrow. On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Brian Toscano wrote: > I haven't seen that either... > > Often the RAID arrays come new with one batch of driv

Re: [MBZ] OT: Computer Hard Drives eqevesyd

2012-05-20 Thread Brian Toscano
I haven't seen that either... Often the RAID arrays come new with one batch of drives all of the same make/model and over time the replacements come from different lots. For example, a new RAID array may have all Seagate drives, and as they fail we may get another make/model as a replacement. On

[MBZ] OT: Computer Hard Drives eqevesyd

2012-05-20 Thread Dan Penoff
Not sure I would agree with the assumption that if one fails the other will be close behind. One of the pieces of equipment I manage in our data center is one of a number of SANs, which contain literally hundreds of hard drives. I can attest to the fact that they are all from the same manufact