> > MAO wrote:
> >
> > I was told that TOR is seen by agencies. i.e. not secure.
> Dan wrote:
>
> The exploit got exposed and the Tor folks are buttoning
> things up.
And that is open-source software working as it should.
All public software should be that transparent.
__
On Mon, 7 Dec 2015 14:29:52 -0500 Meade Dillon via Mercedes
wrote:
> What really sickens me is that none of the lapdog media even attempt to
> call him out on such mistakes or question the assumptions behind his
> assertions, they just all nod along, get their soundbite and announce
> "the news"
Word is that Columbia U. or one of the other research universities was given
some money and information by a three letter government agency to compromise
Tor, or at least some of the relays.
The exploit got exposed and the Tor folks are buttoning things up.
Dan
> On Dec 8, 2015, at 1:26 PM, M
Dan wrote:
> I use Tor. Remember, I do cyber security for a living.
I was told that TOR is seen by agencies. i.e. not secure.
mao
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
To Unsubscribe or change delivery options
I use Tor. Remember, I do cyber security for a living.
Dan “Five eyes"
> On Dec 7, 2015, at 7:31 PM, Mountain Man via Mercedes
> wrote:
>
>
> We don't need protections. We have liberty. Use that liberty to
> invent / innovate a means away from snooping eyes. We have done it
> before and
Apparently someone called the POS a "total (part of female genitalia)
on some TV show. LOL
http://gawker.com/someone-called-obama-a-pussy-on-live-tv-today-guess-whi-1746657198
The PC speak is starting to crack. Col. Peters speaks for most of the USA.
That is a good sign.
NO irreverance m
Dan wrote:
> The level of intrusion that certain government agencies have taken on without
> our knowledge greatly troubles me, and I consider it a direct compromise of
> my Constitutional rights. We need transparency, or we have no protections
> from such activities or those behind them.
>
We
Yeah. Like that’s going to work.
The really worst possible outcome is that this get legislated. I can see that
being a huge battle of the lobbyists, with companies like Apple that have
massive war chests/cash fighting to the bitter end.
You want to give up the keys to your house? Or leave a
Hilz is out in Collyfawnya trying to get Apple to give up their keys,
"enlisting Silicon Valley in the overseas contingency operations against
ISIL."
--R
On 12/7/15 5:30 PM, Dan Penoff via Mercedes wrote:
It’s well known that nearly all the organized “bad guys” have either been using
encrypt
It’s well known that nearly all the organized “bad guys” have either been using
encrypted communications or have gone offline even before 9/11. Heck, they
even know when some of our satellites are overhead, and act accordingly. The
idea that allowing a back door for encryption will allow LEAs
Dan, I'm with you mostly on that, I believe citizens have the right of
privacy and should be able to communicate without anyone listening if so
desired. I firmly believe that good 'ol fashioned HUMINT (by which I mean
actually getting out from behind the desk / computer and talking to real
people
I'm just stunned by the constant rhetoric about encryption, and how if we don't
create back doors in everything for Johnny Law to track down terrorists we'll
be overrun. That and how the Snowden stuff has made all these groups suddenly
aware of how they're being watched.
Total BS, all of it.
D
What really sickens me is that none of the lapdog media even attempt to
call him out on such mistakes or question the assumptions behind his
assertions, they just all nod along, get their soundbite and announce "the
news" and expect the good little sheeple to just believe it and go along
with the a
I was jarred listening to the speech last night many times. What really got
me was this line:
<>
She came on a K-1 class fiancée visa, not the visa waiver program. Citizens
of Pakistan are not eligible for the visa waiver program. Who writes this
stuff? Oh wait...he is a better speech writer
I was jarred listening to the speech last night many times. What really got
me was this line:
<>
She came on a K-1 class fiancée visa, not the visa waiver program. Citizens
of Pakistan are not eligible for the visa waiver program. Who writes this
stuff? Oh wait...he is a better speech write
15 matches
Mail list logo
