I like the fact that hot showers relieve the symptoms. That is some weird
sh*t, man.
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 9:44 AM Floyd Thursby via Mercedes <
mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:
> That's interesting. It actually helps cancer chemotherapy patients with
> the opposite effect, but they might not be
That's interesting. It actually helps cancer chemotherapy patients with
the opposite effect, but they might not be "heavy" users
--FT
On 11/12/19 9:32 AM, Andrew Strasfogel via Mercedes wrote:
*Hospitals see rare vomiting syndrome in heavy marijuana consumers*
Since recreational marijuana
*Hospitals see rare vomiting syndrome in heavy marijuana consumers*
Since recreational marijuana became legal in Massachusetts three years ago,
hospitals have noticed more cases of a rare illness afflicting a small
portion of heavy cannabis consumers.
The condition, called cannabinoid hyperemesis
Maybe the anti-vax'ers have a point - let disease thin the herd ...
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 4:45 PM Max Dillon via Mercedes <
mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:
>
> Yes, we must start eating the babies!
>
> Max Dillon
> Charleston SC
>
> Thu Nov 07 14:43:55 EST 2019 OK Don via Mercedes :
>
> > As I've
Yes, we must start eating the babies!
Max Dillon
Charleston SC
Thu Nov 07 14:43:55 EST 2019 OK Don via Mercedes :
> As I've said before, TANSTAAFL - it's all bad for the environment due to
> the massive over population of humans.
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 1:01 PM Andrew Strasfogel via
As I've said before, TANSTAAFL - it's all bad for the environment due to
the massive over population of humans.
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 1:01 PM Andrew Strasfogel via Mercedes <
mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:
> Unlike burning fuels to generate electricity.
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 1:18 PM Curley
Unlike burning fuels to generate electricity.
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 1:18 PM Curley McLain via Mercedes <
mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote:
> It is wasteful wanton willful destruction of the environment.
>
> Andrew Strasfogel via Mercedes wrote on 11/7/19 9:51 AM:
> > It's like any other product of
It is wasteful wanton willful destruction of the environment.
Andrew Strasfogel via Mercedes wrote on 11/7/19 9:51 AM:
It's like any other product of rapidly changing, disruptive technology. Out
with the old, in with the new.
There was a story on NPR about how challenging it is to recycle Li
On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 07:52:00 -0800 Jim Cathey via Mercedes
wrote:
> I don't buy their argument. Lay them out on the ground, tuck some nice
> sticks of dynamite under there, and light the candle. Drive over the
> remains a few times with the biggest Cat you have, scoop up the remains,
> and THEN
> There was a story on NPR about how challenging it is to recycle Li ion
> batteries but I didn't hear it all. Sounded like they were making
> progress...
Dump them into one of the waste-to-energy plants. I hear they
burn nicely. Mine the ashes for Lithium and other metals...
-- Jim
Just illustrating that it's the SYSTEM costs that must be evaluated. Full
cradle-to-grave
impact. Otherwise you're just jerking off.
I don't buy their argument. Lay them out on the ground, tuck some nice sticks
of dynamite
under there, and light the candle. Drive over the remains a few
It's like any other product of rapidly changing, disruptive technology. Out
with the old, in with the new.
There was a story on NPR about how challenging it is to recycle Li ion
batteries but I didn't hear it all. Sounded like they were making
progress...
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 10:48 AM Floyd
Well it did say they were "decommissioned" whatever that means. I wonder
why they don't ship them off to somewhere else to use if they are still
viable. New blades must cost some fair change. It also mentioned the
nacelles being scrapped, must have some fiberglass sheathing on them.
You or floyd need to design a hammermill big enough to shred them. THe
shredded remains can be used to make FRC roads. (Fiber reinforced
roads) Of course the road builders won't like that THey depend
on rebuilding each road every 5-10 years to maintain their lavish lifestyle.
G
It's my understanding that the new turbine blades last forever + 5 years.
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 10:31 AM G Mann via Mercedes
wrote:
> But, But, But it's clean energy we are saving the earth and
> it's free...
>
> Ooops... where's Andrew he is a geologist... he will know how to
But, But, But it's clean energy we are saving the earth and
it's free...
Ooops... where's Andrew he is a geologist... he will know how to
recycle these... Maybe we could feed them into an active volcano and blend
the emissions into the toxic gas cloud from the volcano ?
On
Never thought of this. I wonder if these blades are from decommissioned
machines or reached a fatigue life or what.
https://www.educationviews.org/landfill-begins-burying-non-recyclable-wind-turbine-blades
--
--FT
___
http://www.okiebenz.com
To search
17 matches
Mail list logo
