Re: [MBZ] OT: audio equipment question

2008-09-02 Thread Luther
You need a 4:1 balun to convert from the balanced 300 ohm at your receiver to the unbalanced 75 ohm RG59 cable coax. -- Luther KB5QHUAlma, Ark '87 300SDL (278,xxx mi) '85 Ford F250 6.9 diesel (x59,xxx mi) BioBeast '82 300CD (181 kmi) '82 300D (74 kmi) getting donor engine-sold '85 300D (

[MBZ] OT: audio equipment question

2008-09-01 Thread Dillon, Meade M CIV SPAWARSYSCEN Charleston SC J63
FM? I only get Rush and Sean and Dr. Savage on AM channels... Very respectfully, /s/ Max Dillon '87 300TD, 310k miles Charleston SC Digest lurker (on and off) since 2001 -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/ms

Re: [MBZ] OT: audio equipment question

2008-09-01 Thread Wonko the Sane
I only got cranky about the pic because OKDonn chastised me yesterday about not using a tripod, so I did for the pic of the back of the receiver. Well, okay, the "tripod" was the digital camera sitting on top of two books-on-tape volumes: A Prairie Home Companion 20th Anniversary Collection and Hit

Re: [MBZ] OT: audio equipment question

2008-09-01 Thread Rich Thomas
I did not click on it then, but just did. It does not have a coax connection so you are stuck with your dipole or an adapter for coax-->75ohm. --R Wonko the Sane wrote: > My pic is bad Did you click on the thumbnail for 1024x600 size? I think > it is pretty readable. > > On Mon, Sep 1, 200

Re: [MBZ] OT: audio equipment question

2008-09-01 Thread Wonko the Sane
Yea. I did some more research and sounds like most cable companies have allocated the bandwidth that used to carry FM signals to more channels. I am probably stuck with the dipole, although an old boom box I have in the garage seems to pull NPR pretty well (signal comes from Ames). Although I do h

Re: [MBZ] OT: audio equipment question

2008-09-01 Thread OK Don
I would expose the shield of the coax, clamp it under the clamp, and wrap the center conductor around the screw and tighten. That said, I don't think you're going to get FM frequency signals from the cable service. You could hang an old TV antenna, or even an FM dipole, in the attic, and run coax

Re: [MBZ] OT: audio equipment question

2008-09-01 Thread Wonko the Sane
My pic is bad Did you click on the thumbnail for 1024x600 size? I think it is pretty readable. On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Rich Thomas < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Most receivers only have the 75ohm two screw antenna connector, your pic is > bad and I can't make out if it has a coax con

Re: [MBZ] OT: audio equipment question

2008-09-01 Thread Rich Thomas
Won't work, you need a cable box to decode the signal. Some of the TV signal can be processed by a regular TV tuner (if it is "cable ready") off the basic cable but the other stuff needs the box to decode as it is encrypted. The music channels are all digital signals. The coax won't act as an

[MBZ] OT: audio equipment question

2008-09-01 Thread Wonko the Sane
Since I have cable television running to the garage now, am thinking about tapping into the cable for my FM music audio signal. Local cable carries digital music (I don't subscribe). I realize I can't pick up those broadcasts using my receiver. But -- I wonder if the cable signal can be used as a