Re: [MBZ] Smart, I guess

2006-08-31 Thread Hendrik Riessen
n and on and onabout how crappy everybody elses driving is. - Original Message - From: "Jim Cathey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mercedes Discussion List" Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 10:03 AM Subject: Re: [MBZ] Smart, I guess What, drive it i

Re: [MBZ] Smart, I guess

2006-08-31 Thread Jim Cathey
What, drive it into a wall? Or another car, your choice! Seriously I am interested to know how they function, are there sensors which detect the crumple zone crumpling or is there a sensor in the seat belt mechanism which can tell when an emergencey situation exists? All three squibs have t

Re: [MBZ] Smart, I guess

2006-08-30 Thread Hendrik Riessen
athey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mercedes Discussion List" Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 1:03 AM Subject: Re: [MBZ] Smart, I guess On an unrelated safety note, while fixing the central locking in my 85 201 I noticed that it is fitted with seat belt force pre tensioners, won

Re: [MBZ] Smart, I guess

2006-08-30 Thread Jim Cathey
On an unrelated safety note, while fixing the central locking in my 85 201 I noticed that it is fitted with seat belt force pre tensioners, wonder wether they still work? One sure way to find out! -- Jim

Re: [MBZ] Smart, I guess

2006-08-30 Thread Hendrik Riessen
seat belt force pre tensioners, wonder wether they still work? - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 11:48 AM Subject: Re: [MBZ] Smart, I guess <smacking e-classes, or the video of it hitting a concrete barrier at 70 mph (mind t

Re: [MBZ] Smart, I guess

2006-08-30 Thread RELNGSON
<> I have seen the video of a Smart vs a barrier and it's true that the structure did not fold up. That's important but what was not revealed were the G-forces involved. Since the car has no crush zones to speak of, the G-forces would be much higher than, let us say, my W203 which has all that