Augie Fackler writes:
>> On Dec 24, 2016, at 1:34 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
>>
>> Where do we stand with this series? I was waiting for feedback, but none
>> arrived.
>
> I believe I had asked that others look at it, and hearing nothing, we should
> conclude nobody else cares and move on and q
David Soria Parra writes:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 11:08:12AM -0500, Augie Fackler wrote:
>> # HG changeset patch
>> # User Augie Fackler
>> # Date 1482509162 18000
>> # Fri Dec 23 11:06:02 2016 -0500
>> # Node ID f48d84ce78aed4a3d063b08da0f7178028192501
>> # Parent 4d7de32b44efc1a385466e
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 09:07:58PM +0900, Yuya Nishihara wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Dec 2016 14:10:05 +, Jun Wu wrote:
> > The goal is to move "pager" logic inside "runcommand" (both client and
> > server side) and remove the "getpager" API. And I'd like to discuss some
> > implementation details befo
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 11:03:03AM +0100, Pierre-Yves David wrote:
>
>
> On 12/27/2016 01:03 AM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
> > # HG changeset patch
> > # User Gregory Szorc
> > # Date 1482796356 25200
> > # Mon Dec 26 16:52:36 2016 -0700
> > # Node ID 10645505563a162bb6d91a90e8b3ded769dcdbb1
> > #
> On Dec 28, 2016, at 4:54 PM, Pierre-Yves David
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/25/2016 09:01 AM, Yuya Nishihara wrote:
>> On Thu, 22 Dec 2016 03:33:46 +0530, Pulkit Goyal wrote:
>>> # HG changeset patch
>>> # User Pulkit Goyal <7895pul...@gmail.com>
>>> # Date 1482095138 -19800
>>> # Mon Dec 19
# HG changeset patch
# User Gregory Szorc
# Date 1482965297 25200
# Wed Dec 28 15:48:17 2016 -0700
# Node ID 4a560014d6d64edcefb1d431e882824771c5ae15
# Parent dc5b594f41e9be5820ce3f197d3817379b2d3af5
hgweb: link to raw-file on annotation page (BC)
Every other template has the "raw" link loa
FUJIWARA Katsunori a écrit :
At Mon, 26 Dec 2016 22:47:14 +0900,
Yuya Nishihara wrote:
On Sun, 25 Dec 2016 18:06:58 -0500, Augie Fackler wrote:
On Dec 25, 2016, at 4:44 AM, Yuya Nishihara wrote:
On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 14:56:51 -0500, Augie Fackler wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 02:30:15PM +0100
On 12/25/2016 09:01 AM, Yuya Nishihara wrote:
On Thu, 22 Dec 2016 03:33:46 +0530, Pulkit Goyal wrote:
# HG changeset patch
# User Pulkit Goyal <7895pul...@gmail.com>
# Date 1482095138 -19800
# Mon Dec 19 02:35:38 2016 +0530
# Node ID eee84d7c0647a50d4e9828b324e1e37214abd169
# Parent e995
Denis Laxalde wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Denis Laxalde
> # Date 1480086890 -3600
> # Fri Nov 25 16:14:50 2016 +0100
> # Node ID 5e5ec2ade2cfc829cffba145193da5801c5b20e7
> # Parent c8dfd10c5865cfe882a00595743f3f709f41317f
> # EXP-Topic linerange-log/revset
> revset: add a changes
> On Dec 27, 2016, at 4:57 AM, Pierre-Yves David
> wrote:
>
>> This patch introduces a check-code check for the sanity of
>> default argument values. It does so by parsing and walking the
>> AST. Previously, all check-code checks were implemented as
>> regular expressions. I probably could have
> On Dec 28, 2016, at 7:37 AM, Jun Wu wrote:
>
> With this change,
>
> - Code becomes longer (if None is tested explicitly)
Yep.
> - Slower, extra tests and GCs (especially in a tight loop)
Py_None will at worst get decref'd. It’s a singleton, so there won’t be any
extra GC’ing. `is` chec
> On Dec 28, 2016, at 11:17 AM, Pierre-Yves David
> wrote:
>
>> The sum of those things is that I’d prefer, in new code, to violate the
>> oral-history-only (that is, not codified in a check-code rule or other
>> formal coding style declaration) convention whereby constants are
>> indistingu
> On Dec 28, 2016, at 11:17 AM, Pierre-Yves David
> wrote:
>
>> Possible steps forward: we agree to discuss this at the sprint (so probably
>> March), knowing that I'll probably want to go and do invasive cleanup of
>> constants in network-related code at that time, or we actually discuss
>>
(bcc adgar in case he can provide insight, but I don’t know if he remembers or
if he’s on vacation this/next week at all)
> On Dec 28, 2016, at 11:20 AM, Pierre-Yves David
> wrote:
>
diff --git a/mercurial/help/internals/revlogs.txt
b/mercurial/help/internals/revlogs.txt
--- a/
On 12/24/2016 08:48 PM, Augie Fackler wrote:
On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 07:30:57PM +0100, Pierre-Yves David wrote:
On 12/24/2016 05:36 PM, Remi Chaintron wrote:
# HG changeset patch
# User Remi Chaintron
# Date 1482451718 18000
# Thu Dec 22 19:08:38 2016 -0500
# Node ID c1bd9b7750cdfe1f2
On 12/15/2016 11:38 PM, Augie Fackler wrote:
(I’m trying to be brief here - hopefully it doesn’t come across as upset,
because I’m not - mostly I was blindsided by a policy claim that I don’t
remember.)
On Dec 15, 2016, at 3:40 PM, Pierre-Yves David
wrote:
So, to sum up, my stance is "Le
With this change,
- Code becomes longer (if None is tested explicitly)
- Slower, extra tests and GCs (especially in a tight loop)
- "None" passed explicitly is ignored
I'm aware that some other checkers do the same check but it does not look
the best way to avoid these kinds of errors due t
17 matches
Mail list logo
