On 10/07/2016 05:41 PM, timeless wrote:
Gábor Stefanik wrote:
copies: update _checkcopies to work in a rotated DAG
I'd argue this should be tagged (BC).
I absolutely support this change, it should be changed, it is a bug.
But the reason I'd argue that it's a change is that a repository
Gábor Stefanik wrote:
> copies: update _checkcopies to work in a rotated DAG
I'd argue this should be tagged (BC).
I absolutely support this change, it should be changed, it is a bug.
But the reason I'd argue that it's a change is that a repository
constructed along this path will result in a
# HG changeset patch
# User Gábor Stefanik
# Date 1475588213 -7200
# Tue Oct 04 15:36:53 2016 +0200
# Node ID 08f3260e3764bcfbe13945aa62bf079807df02fc
# Parent 5b7cd65a9be6c82b3ad14096b41db44c198a6769
copies: update _checkcopies to work in a rotated DAG
This