Re: [PATCH 3 of 3 RFC] templatekw: use common "rev:node" format as the default of predecessors

2017-06-20 Thread Boris Feld
On Mon, 2017-06-19 at 21:08 +0900, Yuya Nishihara wrote: > On Sun, 18 Jun 2017 18:04:19 +0200, Boris Feld wrote: > > The series look much more better, thank you! > > > > The output is much more clear too! > > Thanks. > > > What would be the best way to include it with an option in hg log > > out

Re: [PATCH 3 of 3 RFC] templatekw: use common "rev:node" format as the default of predecessors

2017-06-19 Thread Yuya Nishihara
On Sun, 18 Jun 2017 18:04:19 +0200, Boris Feld wrote: > The series look much more better, thank you! > > The output is much more clear too! Thanks. > What would be the best way to include it with an option in hg log > output? Include it by default? Then you'll need to update changeset_printer a

Re: [PATCH 3 of 3 RFC] templatekw: use common "rev:node" format as the default of predecessors

2017-06-18 Thread Boris Feld
The series look much more better, thank you! The output is much more clear too! What would be the best way to include it with an option in hg log output? On Sat, 2017-06-17 at 14:02 +0900, Yuya Nishihara wrote: > # HG changeset patch > # User Yuya Nishihara > # Date 1497674058 -32400 > #  S

[PATCH 3 of 3 RFC] templatekw: use common "rev:node" format as the default of predecessors

2017-06-16 Thread Yuya Nishihara
# HG changeset patch # User Yuya Nishihara # Date 1497674058 -32400 # Sat Jun 17 13:34:18 2017 +0900 # Node ID 858c7664b9097bc159bd9347648c1fd17de2826e # Parent 5b1a8349209c04dfc5aec3c52a97f7302bcaf322 templatekw: use common "rev:node" format as the default of predecessors I'm not sure if t