# HG changeset patch
# User Yuya Nishihara
# Date 1477199774 -32400
# Sun Oct 23 14:16:14 2016 +0900
# Branch stable
# Node ID 242b7a856495179795ee5662f298029c4b492563
# Parent ecbce2fe4dea116c925a2fecd1b7b50df0a62589
changectx: do not include hidden revisions on short node lookup (issue4964
On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 23:17:14 +0900, Yuya Nishihara wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Yuya Nishihara
> # Date 1477199774 -32400
> # Sun Oct 23 14:16:14 2016 +0900
> # Branch stable
> # Node ID 242b7a856495179795ee5662f298029c4b492563
> # Parent ecbce2fe4dea116c925a2fecd1b7b50df0a62589
>
On 10/26/2016 03:17 PM, Yuya Nishihara wrote:
On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 23:17:14 +0900, Yuya Nishihara wrote:
# HG changeset patch
# User Yuya Nishihara
# Date 1477199774 -32400
# Sun Oct 23 14:16:14 2016 +0900
# Branch stable
# Node ID 242b7a856495179795ee5662f298029c4b492563
# Parent ecbce2
On Fri, 28 Oct 2016 10:31:40 +0200, Pierre-Yves David wrote:
> On 10/26/2016 03:17 PM, Yuya Nishihara wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 23:17:14 +0900, Yuya Nishihara wrote:
> >> # HG changeset patch
> >> # User Yuya Nishihara
> >> # Date 1477199774 -32400
> >> # Sun Oct 23 14:16:14 2016 +0900
>
I think the final solution to teach the C radix tree code about what are
hidden. I will take a look some time in the future.
Excerpts from Yuya Nishihara's message of 2016-10-28 21:48:10 +0900:
> On Fri, 28 Oct 2016 10:31:40 +0200, Pierre-Yves David wrote:
> > On 10/26/2016 03:17 PM, Yuya Nishihar
On 10/28/2016 02:48 PM, Yuya Nishihara wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2016 10:31:40 +0200, Pierre-Yves David wrote:
On 10/26/2016 03:17 PM, Yuya Nishihara wrote:
On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 23:17:14 +0900, Yuya Nishihara wrote:
# HG changeset patch
# User Yuya Nishihara
# Date 1477199774 -32400
# Sun O
Excerpts from Pierre-Yves David's message of 2016-11-01 16:59:36 +0100:
> So, just to confirm, the performance impact will only show up in case
> where we would have raised and ambiguity error anyway ? So in the only
> behavior/performance impact we'll see is a move from an abort to a
> slightly
On 11/01/2016 05:17 PM, Jun Wu wrote:
Excerpts from Pierre-Yves David's message of 2016-11-01 16:59:36 +0100:
So, just to confirm, the performance impact will only show up in case
where we would have raised and ambiguity error anyway ? So in the only
behavior/performance impact we'll see is a
On Tue, 1 Nov 2016 16:17:57 +, Jun Wu wrote:
> Excerpts from Pierre-Yves David's message of 2016-11-01 16:59:36 +0100:
> > So, just to confirm, the performance impact will only show up in case
> > where we would have raised and ambiguity error anyway ? So in the only
> > behavior/performance