On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Boris Feld wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-11-03 at 14:57 +0100, Denis Laxalde wrote:
> > Martin von Zweigbergk a écrit :
> > > On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 7:16 AM, Denis Laxalde
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Augie Fackler a écrit :
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Nov 2, 2017, at 0
On Fri, 2017-11-03 at 14:57 +0100, Denis Laxalde wrote:
> Martin von Zweigbergk a écrit :
> > On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 7:16 AM, Denis Laxalde
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Augie Fackler a écrit :
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On Nov 2, 2017, at 09:39, Martin von Zweigbergk via Mercurial-
> > > > devel <
> > > > >
Yes, please! I'd be very much in favor of that. (Sorry, I misunderstood
what the patch was about when I looked last time.)
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017, 06:57 Denis Laxalde wrote:
> Martin von Zweigbergk a écrit :
> > On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 7:16 AM, Denis Laxalde wrote:
> >
> >> Augie Fackler a écrit :
Martin von Zweigbergk a écrit :
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 7:16 AM, Denis Laxalde wrote:
Augie Fackler a écrit :
On Nov 2, 2017, at 09:39, Martin von Zweigbergk via Mercurial-devel <
mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org> wrote:
Can we still change the behavior of "hg revert -i -r" to show a to-a
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 7:16 AM, Denis Laxalde wrote:
> Augie Fackler a écrit :
>
>>
>> On Nov 2, 2017, at 09:39, Martin von Zweigbergk via Mercurial-devel <
>>> mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Can we still change the behavior of "hg revert -i -r" to show a to-apply
>>> diff, not
Augie Fackler a écrit :
On Nov 2, 2017, at 09:39, Martin von Zweigbergk via Mercurial-devel
wrote:
Can we still change the behavior of "hg revert -i -r" to show a to-apply diff,
not a to-revert diff? (There's a bug number I'm too lazy to look up from mobile.)
I thought we had already done
> On Nov 2, 2017, at 09:39, Martin von Zweigbergk via Mercurial-devel
> wrote:
>
> Can we still change the behavior of "hg revert -i -r" to show a to-apply
> diff, not a to-revert diff? (There's a bug number I'm too lazy to look up
> from mobile.)
I thought we had already done the patch-reve
On Thu, 02 Nov 2017 13:39:59 +, Martin von Zweigbergk wrote:
> Can we still change the behavior of "hg revert -i -r" to show a to-apply
> diff, not a to-revert diff? (There's a bug number I'm too lazy to look up
> from mobile.)
Oh, I thought "revert -i" would already work that way. I think BC
Can we still change the behavior of "hg revert -i -r" to show a to-apply
diff, not a to-revert diff? (There's a bug number I'm too lazy to look up
from mobile.)
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017, 05:47 Yuya Nishihara wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 10:03:44 +0100, Denis Laxalde wrote:
> > Augie Fackler a écrit :
On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 10:03:44 +0100, Denis Laxalde wrote:
> Augie Fackler a écrit :
> > # HG changeset patch
> > # User Augie Fackler
> > # Date 1509399967 14400
> > # Mon Oct 30 17:46:07 2017 -0400
> > # Node ID a2fc2086ac3116c63ab890180697b2695c50d9f4
> > # Parent 3ce0e4b51f789eff195ec900a07
Augie Fackler a écrit :
# HG changeset patch
# User Augie Fackler
# Date 1509399967 14400
# Mon Oct 30 17:46:07 2017 -0400
# Node ID a2fc2086ac3116c63ab890180697b2695c50d9f4
# Parent 3ce0e4b51f789eff195ec900a07c1fa5e8d5c5f2
revert: no longer mark --interactive as experimental
We seem to h
# HG changeset patch
# User Augie Fackler
# Date 1509399967 14400
# Mon Oct 30 17:46:07 2017 -0400
# Node ID a2fc2086ac3116c63ab890180697b2695c50d9f4
# Parent 3ce0e4b51f789eff195ec900a07c1fa5e8d5c5f2
revert: no longer mark --interactive as experimental
We seem to have settled down on behavi
12 matches
Mail list logo