This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rHG27d5c2d2db2b: rewriteutil: add utility function to check if
we can create new unstable cset (authored by pulkit, committed by ).
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE
https://phab.mercu
pulkit updated this revision to Diff 3911.
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1502?vs=3899&id=3911
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1502
AFFECTED FILES
mercurial/rewriteutil.py
CHANGE DETAILS
diff --git a/mercurial/rewrite
dlax requested changes to this revision.
dlax added inline comments.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
INLINE COMMENTS
> rewriteutil.py:20
> +To allow new unstable changesets, set the config:
> +`experimental.evolution.allounstable=True`
> +"""
typo: allounstable
RE
pulkit added a comment.
In https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1502#25341, @dlax wrote:
> > This rewriteutil.py introduced in this patch and the utility functions
added in the upcoming patches exists in the evolve extension are being ported
from there.
>
> Is it worth porting this alone
pulkit updated this revision to Diff 3899.
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1502?vs=3809&id=3899
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1502
AFFECTED FILES
mercurial/rewriteutil.py
CHANGE DETAILS
diff --git a/mercurial/rewrite
dlax added a comment.
> This rewriteutil.py introduced in this patch and the utility functions
added in the upcoming patches exists in the evolve extension are being ported
from there.
Is it worth porting this alone if nothing in core makes use of this module?
Or is there a larger plan
pulkit created this revision.
Herald added a subscriber: mercurial-devel.
Herald added a reviewer: hg-reviewers.
REVISION SUMMARY
This patch adds a new file which will contain utility functions related to
rewritting changesets. It also adds a utility function to check if the
rewritting opera
