D1758: remotenames: add new namespaces for remotebookmarks and remotebranches

2017-12-25 Thread pulkit (Pulkit Goyal)
pulkit created this revision. Herald added a subscriber: mercurial-devel. Herald added a reviewer: hg-reviewers. REVISION SUMMARY This patch adds two new namespaces which will be enabled by remotenames extension. The namespaces are remotebookmarks and remotebranches. Adding them as namespace

D1758: remotenames: add new namespaces for remotebookmarks and remotebranches

2018-01-18 Thread durin42 (Augie Fackler)
durin42 requested changes to this revision. durin42 added a comment. This revision now requires changes to proceed. Easiest path is to mark this as experimental, and then we can do an iteration in the next cycle and remove the warning label. INLINE COMMENTS > remotenames.py:189 > +

D1758: remotenames: add new namespaces for remotebookmarks and remotebranches

2018-01-18 Thread pulkit (Pulkit Goyal)
pulkit added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS > durin42 wrote in remotenames.py:189 > Hm, I'm not sure if we want to name remote{bookmarks,branches} the same as > local ones in log output. It may make sense to defer this until after the > freeze, or else mark the remotenames extension as experi

D1758: remotenames: add new namespaces for remotebookmarks and remotebranches

2018-01-22 Thread pulkit (Pulkit Goyal)
pulkit added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS > durin42 wrote in remotenames.py:189 > Hm, I'm not sure if we want to name remote{bookmarks,branches} the same as > local ones in log output. It may make sense to defer this until after the > freeze, or else mark the remotenames extension as experi

D1758: remotenames: add new namespaces for remotebookmarks and remotebranches

2018-01-22 Thread durin42 (Augie Fackler)
durin42 added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS > pulkit wrote in remotenames.py:189 > > Hm, I'm not sure if we want to name remote{bookmarks,branches} the same as > > local ones in log > output. > > Does remotebookmark, and remotebranch sounds good? Works for me. REPOSITORY rHG Mercurial R

D1758: remotenames: add new namespaces for remotebookmarks and remotebranches

2018-01-22 Thread martinvonz (Martin von Zweigbergk)
martinvonz added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS > pulkit wrote in remotenames.py:189 > > Hm, I'm not sure if we want to name remote{bookmarks,branches} the same as > > local ones in log > output. > > Does remotebookmark, and remotebranch sounds good? > Does remotebookmark, and remotebranch s

D1758: remotenames: add new namespaces for remotebookmarks and remotebranches

2018-02-01 Thread pulkit (Pulkit Goyal)
pulkit updated this revision to Diff 5147. REPOSITORY rHG Mercurial CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1758?vs=4612&id=5147 REVISION DETAIL https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D1758 AFFECTED FILES hgext/remotenames.py tests/test-logexchange.t CHANGE DETAILS diff --

D1758: remotenames: add new namespaces for remotebookmarks and remotebranches

2018-02-01 Thread pulkit (Pulkit Goyal)
pulkit added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS > martinvonz wrote in remotenames.py:189 > > Does remotebookmark, and remotebranch sounds good? > > Will the log output get aligned for these longer names? > > Should we include a space? "remote bookmark:" looks more user-friendly I made it `remote

D1758: remotenames: add new namespaces for remotebookmarks and remotebranches

2018-02-12 Thread pulkit (Pulkit Goyal)
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes. Closed by commit rHG382aefea8faf: remotenames: add new namespaces for remotebookmarks and remotebranches (authored by pulkit, committed by ). REPOSITORY rHG Mercurial CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE https://phab.mercurial-sc

D1758: remotenames: add new namespaces for remotebookmarks and remotebranches

2018-02-13 Thread martinvonz (Martin von Zweigbergk)
martinvonz added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS > test-logexchange.t:130-131 > + | tag: tip > + | remote branch:$TESTTMP/server2/wat > + | remote branch:default/wat > + | parent: 4:aa98ab95a928 This is pretty hard to read. Should we at least add a space between the label-

D1758: remotenames: add new namespaces for remotebookmarks and remotebranches

2018-02-14 Thread pulkit (Pulkit Goyal)
pulkit added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS > martinvonz wrote in test-logexchange.t:130-131 > This is pretty hard to read. Should we at least add a space between the > label-and-colon and the value? I agree with you. I will send a followup for this. REPOSITORY rHG Mercurial REVISION DETA