spectral added a comment.
In https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2013#43547, @martinvonz wrote:
> In https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2013#43542, @indygreg wrote:
>
> > @spectral: what's the state of this series? Do you plan to submit a
follow-up?
>
>
> I think he's waiting for me to
martinvonz added a comment.
In https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2013#43542, @indygreg wrote:
> @spectral: what's the state of this series? Do you plan to submit a
follow-up?
I think he's waiting for me to hopefully do it in a more generic way. I have
been working on that. Turned o
indygreg added a comment.
@spectral: what's the state of this series? Do you plan to submit a follow-up?
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2013
To: spectral, #hg-reviewers
Cc: indygreg, martinvonz, mercurial-devel
___
martinvonz added a comment.
In https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2013#34509, @martinvonz wrote:
> In https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2013#34320, @spectral wrote:
>
> > In https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2013#33867, @martinvonz wrote:
> >
> > > I wonder if we should instead have a --d
martinvonz added a comment.
In https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2013#34320, @spectral wrote:
> In https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2013#33867, @martinvonz wrote:
>
> > I wonder if we should instead have a --draft option for this. Reasons:
> >
> > - If we ever add a fourth phase (like
spectral added a comment.
In https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2013#33867, @martinvonz wrote:
> I wonder if we should instead have a --draft option for this. Reasons:
>
> - If we ever add a fourth phase (like Jun's proposed "archived" phase),
then --no-secret doesn't clearly indicate "d
martinvonz added a comment.
In https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2013#33867, @martinvonz wrote:
> I wonder if we should instead have a --draft option for this. Reasons:
>
> - If we ever add a fourth phase (like Jun's proposed "archived" phase),
then --no-secret doesn't clearly indicate
martinvonz added a comment.
I wonder if we should instead have a --draft option for this. Reasons:
- If we ever add a fourth phase (like Jun's proposed "archived" phase), then
--no-secret doesn't clearly indicate "draft", it could just as well be
"archived".
- Actually, we of course al
spectral created this revision.
Herald added a subscriber: mercurial-devel.
Herald added a reviewer: hg-reviewers.
REVISION SUMMARY
Previously, if the user had phases.new-commit=secret, there was no way on the
command line to commit as draft. This lets the user specify --no-secret to
request
