durin42 (Augie Fackler) writes:
> durin42 created this revision.
> Herald added a subscriber: mercurial-devel.
> Herald added a reviewer: hg-reviewers.
>
> REVISION SUMMARY
> test-obsshelve.t could be merged with test-shelve.t at some point, but
> for now I want the comprehensive coverage.
lothiraldan added a comment.
In https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3684#58106, @durin42 wrote:
> In https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3684#58074, @lothiraldan wrote:
>
> > We have an implementation of shelve without strip nor obsmarkers.
>
>
> Can we see that now? Otherwise I'm going
durin42 added a comment.
In https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3684#58074, @lothiraldan wrote:
> We have an implementation of shelve without strip nor obsmarkers.
Can we see that now? Otherwise I'm going to lobby to land this in the name of
having something done.
REPOSITORY
rHG
lothiraldan added a comment.
After reading your obsshelve series, it seems that we have some overlap.
We have an implementation of shelve without strip nor obsmarkers.
The first series https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3685 is the first half,
cleaning up the shelve extensions in order
lothiraldan added a comment.
We just sent https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3685 that update shelve to not
use rebase anymore.
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3684
To: durin42, #hg-reviewers
Cc: lothiraldan, mercurial-devel
durin42 created this revision.
Herald added a subscriber: mercurial-devel.
Herald added a reviewer: hg-reviewers.
REVISION SUMMARY
test-obsshelve.t could be merged with test-shelve.t at some point, but
for now I want the comprehensive coverage. Note that obsshelve in
hg-experimental is a
