sheehan abandoned this revision.
sheehan added a comment.
> Either way, we'll be deploying this to Mozilla's hg servers in the next few
months and testing it out. Perhaps after it's been in production for some time
we will have a stronger case for inclusion in core. :)
Going to deploy
indygreg added a comment.
In https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5194#77606, @martinvonz wrote:
> Is this useful enough to others that it should live in the hg core repo? It
doesn't seem like it to me, but maybe I'm wrong.
I think having plug-and-play caching solutions in the
sheehan added a comment.
In https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5194#77606, @martinvonz wrote:
> Is this useful enough to others that it should live in the hg core repo? It
doesn't seem like it to me, but maybe I'm wrong.
My thought process was that since the new wire protocol
martinvonz added a comment.
Is this useful enough to others that it should live in the hg core repo? It
doesn't seem like it to me, but maybe I'm wrong.
REPOSITORY
rHG Mercurial
REVISION DETAIL
https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5194
To: sheehan, #hg-reviewers
Cc: martinvonz, indygreg,
sheehan added a subscriber: indygreg.
sheehan added a comment.
Throwing this up for review now, but there are a few things that could be
done to improve this. A cache expiration policy might be useful, but is
difficult to test with the S3 bucket expiration rules. It may also be desirable
to
sheehan created this revision.
Herald added a subscriber: mercurial-devel.
Herald added a reviewer: hg-reviewers.
REVISION SUMMARY
With wireprotocol version two introducing command response caching
and enabling content redirect responses, it is possible to store
response objects in an
