D950: run-tests: update back to original node after bisecting

2017-10-13 Thread ryanmce (Ryan McElroy)
ryanmce accepted this revision as: ryanmce. ryanmce added a comment. I like this overall; but I don't feel I can queue a new flag to bisect without input from the rest of the community. REPOSITORY rHG Mercurial REVISION DETAIL https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D950 To: quark,

D950: run-tests: update back to original node after bisecting

2017-10-13 Thread ryanmce (Ryan McElroy)
ryanmce added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS > quark wrote in run-tests.py:2124-2153 > During the meeting deciding to experiment with Phabricator, I think we agreed > that with Phabricator's ability to diff with whitespaces ignored >

D950: run-tests: update back to original node after bisecting

2017-10-12 Thread quark (Jun Wu)
quark added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS > ryanmce wrote in run-tests.py:2124-2153 > For readability, please add the try/finally (with the finally block being > just `pass` for now) in a separate patch. During the meeting deciding to experiment with Phabricator, I think we agreed that

D950: run-tests: update back to original node after bisecting

2017-10-12 Thread ryanmce (Ryan McElroy)
ryanmce requested changes to this revision. ryanmce added a comment. This revision now requires changes to proceed. I'm +1 on this series and the rest looks fine but I think this one needs some improvements before landing. INLINE COMMENTS > run-tests.py:2115-2116 > return data