(Adding Mercurial-devel mailing list, as I'm not sure if anyone is
actually using mercurial-infrastructure@)
On 08-08-17 09:21, Mathias De Maré wrote:
On 04-05-17 16:36, Anton Shestakov wrote:
On Tue, 2 May 2017 20:30:07 +0200
Pierre-Yves David wrote:
So, we are already operating a repos
On Tue, 2 May 2017 20:30:07 +0200
Pierre-Yves David wrote:
> So, we are already operating a repository at:
>
>https://www.mercurial-scm.org/release/
>
> And we already have all the necessary bits in our current make file to
> create and update it such repository. As pointed in the previous
On 4/27/17 12:23 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
I think the time has come to make a decision about dropping support for
Python 2.6.
In [1], we already decided that supporting 2.6 on Windows made no sense.
While I don't think we ever wrote a patch, support for 2.6 on Windows is
effectively gone.
On 04/27/2017 09:23 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
I think the time has come to make a decision about dropping support for
Python 2.6.
Seems like a good idea overall.
Let me add some details on the step we took to drop 2.4
In [1], we already decided that supporting 2.6 on Windows made no sense
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 12:23:18PM -0700, Gregory Szorc wrote:
> I think the time has come to make a decision about dropping support for
> Python 2.6.
>
> In [1], we already decided that supporting 2.6 on Windows made no sense.
> While I don't think we ever wrote a patch
distros.)
>
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Alex Gaynor wrote:
>
>> FWIW, RHEL 6 supports SCL (Software Collection Libraries) so it's
>> possible to get a Python2.7 _from Red Hat_.
>>
>> Alex
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Gregory
12:26 PM, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> FWIW, RHEL 6 supports SCL (Software Collection Libraries) so it's possible
> to get a Python2.7 _from Red Hat_.
>
> Alex
>
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Gregory Szorc
> wrote:
>
>> I think the time has come to make a decision abo
FWIW, RHEL 6 supports SCL (Software Collection Libraries) so it's possible
to get a Python2.7 _from Red Hat_.
Alex
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Gregory Szorc
wrote:
> I think the time has come to make a decision about dropping support for
> Python 2.6.
>
> In [1], we alr
I think the time has come to make a decision about dropping support for
Python 2.6.
In [1], we already decided that supporting 2.6 on Windows made no sense.
While I don't think we ever wrote a patch, support for 2.6 on Windows is
effectively gone.
Also in that thread, Facebook said they
On 16/03/2017 10:14, Augie Fackler wrote:
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 09:54:27AM -0700, Gregory Szorc wrote:
There is a brewing discussion about the future of Python 2.6 in Mercurial.
I'd like to start with what I think will be an easy proposal: officially
dropping support for 2.6 on Windows.
I'm
On 3/16/17 09:54, Gregory Szorc wrote:
There is a brewing discussion about the future of Python 2.6 in
Mercurial. I'd like to start with what I think will be an easy
proposal: officially dropping support for 2.6 on Windows.
Sounds reasonable to me.
First, I think dropping 2.6 on Windows doe
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 09:54:27AM -0700, Gregory Szorc wrote:
> There is a brewing discussion about the future of Python 2.6 in Mercurial.
> I'd like to start with what I think will be an easy proposal: officially
> dropping support for 2.6 on Windows.
I'm in favor of this. Perhaps also sound the
There is a brewing discussion about the future of Python 2.6 in Mercurial.
I'd like to start with what I think will be an easy proposal: officially
dropping support for 2.6 on Windows.
First, I think dropping 2.6 on Windows doesn't really buy us anything
significant. 2.6 and 2.7 build with the sam
13 matches
Mail list logo
