Re: Topics [was: news from the topic experiment]

2016-11-04 Thread timeless
Sean Farley wrote: > For what it's worth, I've started to work on another repo implementing > what Erik suggested. It removes 'stacks' (since that's obviously out of > scope) and implements a topic-like branch workflow. So far, it's been a > good experiment and requires very little change. I'll

Re: Topics [was: news from the topic experiment]

2016-11-01 Thread Sean Farley
Pierre-Yves David writes: > On 11/01/2016 05:56 AM, Sean Farley wrote: >> Pierre-Yves David writes: >> >>> On 10/15/2016 04:18 PM, Pierre-Yves David wrote: On 10/15/2016 08:47 AM, Yuya Nishihara wrote: > On Fri,

Re: Topics [was: news from the topic experiment]

2016-11-01 Thread Pierre-Yves David
On 11/01/2016 04:55 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote: On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 9:56 PM, Sean Farley > wrote: Pierre-Yves David > writes: > On 10/15/2016 04:18 PM, Pierre-Yves David

Re: Topics [was: news from the topic experiment]

2016-11-01 Thread Sean Farley
Gregory Szorc writes: > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 9:56 PM, Sean Farley wrote: > >> Pierre-Yves David writes: >> >> > On 10/15/2016 04:18 PM, Pierre-Yves David wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> On 10/15/2016 08:47 AM, Yuya Nishihara

Re: Topics [was: news from the topic experiment]

2016-11-01 Thread Gregory Szorc
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 9:56 PM, Sean Farley wrote: > Pierre-Yves David writes: > > > On 10/15/2016 04:18 PM, Pierre-Yves David wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 10/15/2016 08:47 AM, Yuya Nishihara wrote: > >>> On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 13:13:56 -0700, Sean

Re: Topics [was: news from the topic experiment]

2016-10-31 Thread Pierre-Yves David
On 11/01/2016 05:56 AM, Sean Farley wrote: Pierre-Yves David writes: On 10/15/2016 04:18 PM, Pierre-Yves David wrote: On 10/15/2016 08:47 AM, Yuya Nishihara wrote: On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 13:13:56 -0700, Sean Farley wrote: Pierre-Yves David

Re: Topics [was: news from the topic experiment]

2016-10-31 Thread Sean Farley
Pierre-Yves David writes: > On 10/15/2016 04:18 PM, Pierre-Yves David wrote: >> >> >> On 10/15/2016 08:47 AM, Yuya Nishihara wrote: >>> On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 13:13:56 -0700, Sean Farley wrote: Pierre-Yves David writes: > So,

Re: Topics [was: news from the topic experiment]

2016-10-31 Thread Pierre-Yves David
On 10/15/2016 04:18 PM, Pierre-Yves David wrote: On 10/15/2016 08:47 AM, Yuya Nishihara wrote: On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 13:13:56 -0700, Sean Farley wrote: Pierre-Yves David writes: So, the other branch of that thread made me realised that we cannot do this

Re: Topics [was: news from the topic experiment]

2016-10-15 Thread Yuya Nishihara
On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 13:13:56 -0700, Sean Farley wrote: > Pierre-Yves David writes: > > So, the other branch of that thread made me realised that we cannot do > > this "BRANCH:TOPIC" storage in the current "branch" field. > > > > An important part of topic is to

Re: Topics [was: news from the topic experiment]

2016-10-14 Thread Sean Farley
Pierre-Yves David writes: > On 10/14/2016 05:48 PM, Erik van Zijst wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 7:01 AM, Pierre-Yves David >> > >> wrote: >> >> >> So, thanks for exploring

Re: Topics [was: news from the topic experiment]

2016-10-14 Thread Pierre-Yves David
On 10/14/2016 05:48 PM, Erik van Zijst wrote: On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 7:01 AM, Pierre-Yves David > wrote: So, thanks for exploring possibilities to make this frontier thiner. However, I can see some issues with

Re: Topics [was: news from the topic experiment]

2016-10-14 Thread Pierre-Yves David
On 10/14/2016 07:29 PM, Erik van Zijst wrote: On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Pierre-Yves David wrote: If we use the same field for either topic or name branch a changeset can either be: * on a named branch but no topic * on a topic but no named branch (so

Re: Topics [was: news from the topic experiment]

2016-10-14 Thread Augie Fackler
> On Oct 14, 2016, at 1:29 PM, Erik van Zijst wrote: > >> * on a named branch but no topic >> * on a topic but no named branch (so default branch) > > Why would a topic imply that it is on the default branch? I don't > think I see that. In my mental model a topic is

Re: Topics [was: news from the topic experiment]

2016-10-14 Thread Erik van Zijst
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Pierre-Yves David wrote: > If we use the same field for either topic or name branch a changeset can > either be: > > * on a named branch but no topic > * on a topic but no named branch (so default branch) Why would a topic imply

Re: Topics [was: news from the topic experiment]

2016-10-14 Thread Sean Farley
Erik van Zijst writes: > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 7:01 AM, Pierre-Yves David < > pierre-yves.da...@ens-lyon.org> wrote: > >> >> So, thanks for exploring possibilities to make this frontier thiner. >> However, I can see some issues with some aspects of this proposal,

Re: Topics [was: news from the topic experiment]

2016-10-14 Thread Pierre-Yves David
On 10/14/2016 05:48 PM, Erik van Zijst wrote: On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 7:01 AM, Pierre-Yves David > wrote: So, thanks for exploring possibilities to make this frontier thiner. However, I can see some issues with some

Re: Topics [was: news from the topic experiment]

2016-10-14 Thread Erik van Zijst
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 7:01 AM, Pierre-Yves David < pierre-yves.da...@ens-lyon.org> wrote: > > So, thanks for exploring possibilities to make this frontier thiner. > However, I can see some issues with some aspects of this proposal, using > the same field for either branch or topic make them