reason for this change? Additionally, what’s the preferred
action? Should I modify contrib/packaging/packagelib.sh to support “rc”, or
would it be better to go back to the “-rc” naming convention?
Greetings,
Mathias
(sending again from my Gmail address, as my mail from @nokia.com doesn&#
elib.sh to support “rc”, or would it be better to go
> back to the “-rc” naming convention?
We won't be going back, because we need pip to do the right thing.
>
> Greetings,
> Mathias
>
> (sending again from my Gmail a
4.9-rc is not.
>
> > Additionally, what’s the preferred action? Should I modify
> contrib/packaging/packagelib.sh to support “rc”, or would it be better to
> go back to the “-rc” naming convention?
>
> We won't be going back, because we need pip to do the right thing.
>
