All benchmarks say is that "It's good for *this* application".  I've heard
that it speeds up mersenne calculations on some MBs.  Now, that's nice, but
if it doesn't speed it up enough vs its cost.....  That's the question.

I'm just going to hold my breath for DDR-SDRAM.  Cheaper, faster, better
supported. Dual Athlon/interleaved DDR memory.  Hold on to your hats....

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2000 11:57 PM
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:      Mersenne: Re: Mersenne Digest V1 #757
> 
> << Direct RDRAM >>
> 
> <HOLY WAR>Everyone knows (rather, should know) that RDRAM memory provides
> a 
> minor speed boost compared to SDRAM, and the much higher cost of RDRAM is 
> completely unjustified.  I've heard that Dell is switching back to SDRAM
> in 
> its computers now, which is a Good Thing(TM).</HOLY WAR>
> 
> :-D
> 
> Stephan Lavavej
> _________________________________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm
> Mersenne Prime FAQ      -- http://www.tasam.com/~lrwiman/FAQ-mers
_________________________________________________________________
Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm
Mersenne Prime FAQ      -- http://www.tasam.com/~lrwiman/FAQ-mers

Reply via email to