Hi,
Ahh. OK. I see now. I'm glad that my exponent will count as a
double check.
Thanks to everyone that answered!
-Dennis
Original Message Follows
From: George Woltman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Dennis Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Mersenne: Erro
Hi all,
At 08:01 PM 7/19/00 -0700, Dennis Peter wrote:
>I'm testing exponent 8277083 and I'm about 45% done. Every other time
>I've checked in, it was OK. Now I get this error message and the exponent
>is gone from my GIMPS user status page.
>
>I HOPE I DIDN'T WASTE MY CPU CYCLES.
You did no
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Another enhancement would be to add the functionality to force a checkin
> with the server. Currently I have found the only way to do this is to alter
> the number of hours per day field.
>
> This is fairly minor compared to the problem of duplicated effort mentioned
>
ot upset when the original person suddenly completed
his LL test.
Wouldn't it be more 'humane' to wait a bit (i.e., to not 'expire'
assignments after 70 days) ? Will the project truly suffer if
"seemingly abandoned" exponents are NOT reassigned on a 'treadmill'
schedule ?
mikus
For those un
Another enhancement would be to add the functionality to force a checkin
with the server. Currently I have found the only way to do this is to alter
the number of hours per day field.
This is fairly minor compared to the problem of duplicated effort mentioned
below but may elevate the problem sli
On 20 Jul 2000 00:09:20 -0400 "Robert Deininger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have saved some of the hourly status and cleared reports, and I think
> I see what happened.
>
> On 13-May-2000:
> 8277083 64 4126527 105.0 -12.1 42.9
> 16-Apr-00 19:40 29-Jan-00 22:24 floris V
Quoting Dennis Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I got this error on my GIMPS client (version 20.4.1)
x86:
>
> Error 11: exponent already tested
>
> I'm testing exponent 8277083 and I'm about 45% done.
Every other time I've
>
> checked in, it was OK. Now I get this error message
and the expone
