That the P4 is the best platform is a given... I'm curious how the 850
chipset version (RDRAM) compares to the 845 chipset version (SDRAM)...
I noticed that Newegg has retail boxed P4s (1.3GHz) with 2x64MB RDRAM
for $120... I don't know if it is PC600 or PC800 RDRAM, though...
It looks like it w
Hi,
In case any one hasn't noticed:
Everyone in the PrimeNet Top 100 Producers list has now
contributed more than 100 P90 CPU years.
Regards
Brian Beesley
_
Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm
On 14 Oct 2001, at 7:30, Jean-Yves Canart wrote:
> According to latest benchmarks (http://www.mersenne.org/bench.htm),
> AthlonXP seems to be slower than the Thunderbird. Does anybody have a
> technical explanation ?
The Athlon XP lies about its speed. Remember the old Cyrix trick?
Well AMD ha
On Sun, 14 Oct 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 14 Oct 2001, at 7:30, Jean-Yves Canart wrote:
>
> > According to latest benchmarks (http://www.mersenne.org/bench.htm),
> > AthlonXP seems to be slower than the Thunderbird. Does anybody have a
> > technical explanation ?
>
> The Athlon XP lies
Hi,
At 11:41 AM 10/14/2001 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > According to latest benchmarks (http://www.mersenne.org/bench.htm),
> > AthlonXP seems to be slower than the Thunderbird. Does anybody have a
> > technical explanation ?
The technical explanation is that I only have one XP benchmark
On Sun, Oct 14, 2001 at 07:30:24AM +0200, Jean-Yves Canart wrote:
> Hello All
>
> According to latest benchmarks (http://www.mersenne.org/bench.htm),
> AthlonXP seems to be slower than the Thunderbird. Does anybody have a
> technical explanation ?
>
Hi,
The benchmark run was mine, and I was a l
Hi,
At 07:16 PM 10/14/2001 -0700, Matthew Ashton wrote:
>The benchmark run was mine, and I was a little disapointed as well.
>The system is a dual Athlon 1700XP (1460Mhz).
>For the curious, the system is based on the Tyan Tiger MP, and was
>running Linux 2.4.10-ac12 with 1GB of 266Mhz DDR Ram.
I
