On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 07:58:37PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>The point is that it is
>almost impossible to modify a binary image without changing the
>MD5 checksum - in fact, to the best of my knowledge, this has not
>been demonstrated, even in a laboratory environment - a very great
>d
> Finally, reasonable configuration of a firewall (even a personal
> firewall product installed on the workstation itself) will prevent
> exploitation of a Back Orifice type trojan, even if one does manage
> to sneak in unnoticed - these work by creating a listener which
> allows those "in the kno
On 6 Nov 2001, at 16:09, Gerry Snyder wrote:
> In a recent ethics briefing I was told that running seti@home on work
> PC's was a no-no because there had been three break-ins to computers
> using that program as a back door.
>
> No idea whether that is really the case, and no idea what
> communi