Hi,
On Thursday 29 August 2002 15:30, you wrote:
> I have noticed a small but definite increase in the iteration time of
> version 22.8.1 as opposed to 21.4.
>
> During the night, when my 2.2GHz Pentium IV system was free of all other
> processing activities, the iteration times were as follows:
A user has broken down the GIMPS error rate for exponents
between 2 million and 7 million. See ftp://mersenne.org/gimps/err_rate.xls.
I'd ignore the data from 6 million to 7 million as there are many
triple-checks to be done. The data from 5 million to 6 million will not
change much at all. T
Tnx, George (and probably numerious people activated on this "error
29").
I've started upgrading and found a very nice CPU report in 22.8. What I
always wanted to know is now right before my eyes: Pentium III, MMX, SSE
etc. Also doc's are very enjoyable reading, 10% better here and 25%
bette
At 16:59:08, Friday, 8/30/02 Brian Beesley wrote:
> Are we losing users? Well, if users can't connect to the server, they're
> going to be discouraged. Ditto anyone still using Windows 95 - Prime95 v22.3+
> has problems since George apparently upgraded his development kit.
As of version 22.5
- Original Message -
From: "Brian J. Beesley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 2250 is a problem with the server being offline for some reason.
That's not what the faq says . but I think you're correct. At least,
when I restarted this morning (with a 'primenet.ini' containing 'Debug=1',
as sug
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002 20:59:08 +, Brian J. Beesley wrote:
>Are we losing users? Well, if users can't connect to the server, they're
>going to be discouraged. Ditto anyone still using Windows 95 - Prime95 v22.3+
>has problems since George apparently upgraded his development kit.
Well, Win95
On Friday 30 August 2002 04:22, Sisyphus wrote:
> Hi,
> Recently started getting error 29 with Windows, PrimeNet version 21, so
> I've upgraded to version 22.8.
> Now I get error 2250 - so we're definitely making progress
2250 is a problem with the server being offline for some reason.
>
> :-)
>
On Thursday 29 August 2002 13:30, Gary Edstrom wrote:
> I have noticed a small but definite increase in the iteration time of
> version 22.8.1 as opposed to 21.4.
>
> During the night, when my 2.2GHz Pentium IV system was free of all other
> processing activities, the iteration times were as follo
