Dear Brian,
Could you please expand upon how this secure certificate concept would work, for
the benefit of myself and the list? Unless there is more to it than I currently
comprehend, this only authenticates results as coming from specific users,
rather than authenticating that the result is c
Yeah, I noticed that one of their "top 100" users has an average work unit time
of less than 30 minutes. Compare that to the ~22 hours I'm getting for a PII
450Mhz, and the SGI team's average of over 6 hours even though they're running
on just about the most powerful (and sadly, most expensive a
This is what the whatsnew.txt file has to say about starting at bootup:
"On a Windows NT/2000/XP system, if prime95 is run by a user without
administrator privileges then prime95 cannot install itself as a service.
Thus, the Start at Bootup option will set prime95 to run at login time
Hi,
> > Wouldn't it be great if from some point in the near future, "feature
> > request" posts to this newsgroup became more like "I've written a
fancy
> > improved frontend to GIMPS with some cool graphics, see this link
for
> more
> > info",
>
> Actually that happened Sunday!
Would you please
Let's not be _too_ eager to emulate SETI@home's popularity
and user-friendliness --
http://www.zdnet.com.au/newstech/security/story/0,224985,20269509,00
.htm
"Cheats wreak havoc on SETI@home: participants"
"SETI@home administrators are allegedly ignoring claims that the
project is being sabo
On Wednesday 30 October 2002 02:34, Nathan Russell wrote:
>
> Thanks to everyone who responded. In this case, it's a bug in my
> thinking. I had the memory usage set to the max allowable, because I
> wanted P-1 to succeed whenever possible, even if it inconvenienced me
> - I do most of my academ