"Do not add the /3GB switch if you are running Windows 2000 Server,
Microsoft Small Business Server 2000, or Microsoft BackOffice Server
2000. This switch is designed for use only with Windows 2000 Advanced
Server and above."
(from the MS knowledge base).
Same applies to NT 4, where it only works
Isn't this (3GB user mode) only supported on Windows NT Advanced Server? (which
is probably free for you to use but for everyone else costs the same as a new car!)
If it isn't then I've encountered some people who will wish they'd have known
about this a long time ago :-)
Paul Leyland wrote:
Fr
At 01:22 PM 12/5/2002 +, Barry Stokes wrote:
I tried to look at my personal stats today, and got this:
"CGI Error
The specified CGI application misbehaved by not returning a complete set of
HTTP headers. The headers it did return are:
Could not load ADVAPI32.dll"
Has something gone wrong?
> From: Brian J. Beesley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> usable by a single process is limited to 2 GBytes. (There is
> a "big memory"
> variant of the linux kernel which expands this to 3 GBytes,
> but the point still stands).
FWIW, WinNT and its descendents can be booted with /3gb in boot.ini,
I've seen a kernel config option to allow a 3GB-user / 1GB-kernel split, even on
normal hardware, so you should definitely be able to reach 3GB on any CPU type.
As for the 36-bit address extension, I haven't tried it but the following
.config entries look relevant:
# CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G is not set
> Actually it's a lie. I've got a dual Pent III with 4Gb RAM. You cannot
have
> a single process that uses more than 2Gb of RAM with any of the Linux 2.4
kernels.
> We hadda install Solaris on the box to do what we wanted to.
how did you get more than 2GB of address space in usermode in a single
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 08:02:58AM -0800, Chris Marble wrote:
> Actually it's a lie. I've got a dual Pent III with 4Gb RAM. You cannot have
> a single process that uses more than 2Gb of RAM with any of the Linux 2.4 kernels.
> We hadda install Solaris on the box to do what we wanted to.
Hmm, goo
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
>
> Actually, in newer Linux kernels (ie. at least all 2.4.x versions that I can
> remember) you can expand this further, up to 64GB on CPUs that support it
> (which is, AFAIK, Pentium Pro and newer, so in reality it won't be a
> problem). I don't really know what it do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I tried to look at my personal stats today, and got this:
"CGI Error
The specified CGI application misbehaved by not returning a complete set of
HTTP headers. The headers it did return are:
Could not load ADVAPI32.dll"
Has something gone wrong?
-
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 12:31:00PM +, Brian J. Beesley wrote:
> the entire _virtual_ address space is limited to 4 GBytes by the 32 bit
> address bus, and the OS kernel claims some (usually half) of this, so that
> the total memory usable by a single process is limited to 2 GBytes. (There
> is
On Wednesday 04 December 2002 21:46, Daran wrote:
> [... snip ...]
> > ...though I think there needs to be a
> > careful analysis as to what the extra computation time for actual E
> > values might be...
>
> I agree. My tests have been limited to exponents in the 8.1M range, for no
> particular re
George Woltman wrote:
At 10:31 PM 12/3/2002 +, Daran wrote:
The analysis is more complex than this. It really depends on the prime
[...]
I'd be greatly interested in such a study.
Peter Montgomery's dissertation, "An FFT Extension to the Elliptic Curve
Method of Factorization",
ftp://
12 matches
Mail list logo
