Re: Mersenne: Re: 10 million digit overkill

2001-12-29 Thread Nathan Russell
At 08:16 PM 12/26/2001 +, Brian Beesley wrote: >On 25 Dec 2001, at 14:54, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 25, 2001 at 01:41:31AM -0500, Paradox wrote: > > >If the computer above could do each iteration in > > >0.001 sec

Mersenne: Re: 10 million digit overkill

2001-12-28 Thread Keith Garland
+0100 >>From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Subject: Mersenne: Re: 10 million digit overkill >> >>On Tue, Dec 25, 2001 at 01:41:31AM -0500, Paradox wrote: >>>If the computer above could do each iteration in >>>0.000

Re: Mersenne: Re: 10 million digit overkill

2001-12-26 Thread bjb
On 25 Dec 2001, at 14:54, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Tue, Dec 25, 2001 at 01:41:31AM -0500, Paradox wrote: > >If the computer above could do each iteration in > >0.001 seconds, > >the amount of seconds required to complete the task

Mersenne: Re: 10 million digit overkill

2001-12-25 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Tue, Dec 25, 2001 at 01:41:31AM -0500, Paradox wrote: >If the computer above could do each iteration in >0.001 seconds, >the amount of seconds required to complete the task would still be >significantly more than 4,000,000 digits. That