> > >The Post article said that Mr. Blosser, while he was busy doing the NT Prime
> > >stuff, also "posted encrypted info on the Net" or something thereof. I find
> > >this hard to believe. Is that accurate?
> >
> Contacting Primenet to post results constitutes "posting encrypted
> info on the
> >The Post article said that Mr. Blosser, while he was busy doing the NT Prime
> >stuff, also "posted encrypted info on the Net" or something thereof. I find
> >this hard to believe. Is that accurate?
>
Contacting Primenet to post results constitutes "posting encrypted
info on the Net". (The me
>The Post article said that Mr. Blosser, while he was busy doing the NT Prime
>stuff, also "posted encrypted info on the Net" or something thereof. I find
>this hard to believe. Is that accurate?
a) How the heck should WE know??!?
b) Mr. Blosser has himself posted here that this was completel
The Post article said that Mr. Blosser, while he was busy doing the NT Prime
stuff, also "posted encrypted info on the Net" or something thereof. I find
this hard to believe. Is that accurate?
STL
>From: John Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Wed, 16 Sep 1998 05:39:33 -0700
>Subject: Re: Mersenne: Should we or not?
>
>At 02:59 AM 9/16/98 -0400, Vincent J. Mooney Jr. wrote:
>>Should the GIMPS effort discard Alan Blosser's results on the grounds that
>>they were improperly obtained? Surely
