On Sun, 22 Jul 2001 17:39:31 +0200, "Steinar H. Gunderson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>On Sun, Jul 22, 2001 at 04:53:50PM +0200, mohk wrote:
>>Are we alone?
>>
>>1) no, we found something
>>2) dunno :)
>
>Are there more than 38 (aren't we at 38 now? ;-) ) Mersenne primes?
>
>1) No, we found som
On Sun, Jul 22, 2001 at 04:53:50PM +0200, mohk wrote:
>Are we alone?
>
>1) no, we found something
>2) dunno :)
Are there more than 38 (aren't we at 38 now? ;-) ) Mersenne primes?
1) No, we found something.
2) Dunno :-)
Now, of course, we _think_ there are more Mersenne primes out there,
while S
