Cheers to you Mikus. I second you wholeheartedly.
At 11:51 AM 5/24/00 -0500, Mikus Grinbergs wrote:
... some snipping
>
>Since when has this project become a competitive event ?
>
>This mailing list has gotten several messages like the one above,
>which I interpret as comparing
>Since when has this project become a competitive event ?
>
>This mailing list has gotten several messages like the one above,
>which I interpret as comparing ANOTHER USER to standards set by
>the writer, rather than acknowledging that *all* users are
>contributors to the project. Will it mean th
> Nathan Russell wrote:
> >There is a user, "sd70045", who has almost 100 single-checking
> >assignments out on a single machine ID
>
> In any case, these exponents will expire in 16 days. As a
> result, I'm not concerned about it. Within 3 weeks
> they'll be re-circulated among othe
Nathan Russell wrote:
>There is a user, "sd70045", who has almost 100 single-checking
>assignments out on a single machine ID. These would take a
>state-of-the-art box well over two years to finish. Additionally,
>these assignments have almost identical figures for time to
>complete etc. The fi
> There is a user, "___", who has almost 100 single-checkingassignments
> out on a single machine ID. These would take a state-of-the-art box well
> over two years to finish. Additionally, these assignments have almost
> identical figures for time to complete etc. The first exponent in this
Hi all,
There is a user, "sd70045", who has almost 100 single-checkingassignments
out on a single machine ID. These would take a state-of-the-art box well
over two years to finish. Additionally, these assignments have almost
identical figures for time to complete etc. The first exponent in
