Hi all,
There is another, and perhaps the most important reason, progress on
double-checking milestones has been slow. When a double-check is sent in
the server does not have enough information to know if a triple-check is
needed.
That info is in my master database - 3000 miles away. I
Hi,
There are 19 exponents that need triple-checking. I've just assigned them
to three volunteers. With luck, they'll all be finished up in a few weeks.
Regards,
George
_
Unsubscribe & list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/sign
Let me rephrase something from my last message:
There should be 12 non-Primenet exponents left to finish testing
(if they aren't already) to prove both M(2976221) and M(3021377)
are the 36th and 37th Mersenne primes, respectively...
Eric
___
Nathan Russell wrote:
>>From: Jeff Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: Re: Mersenne: Milestones?
>>Date: Tue, 09 May 2000 12:37:31 -0400
>>
>>We still have a handful of exponents to go.
>
>I was looking at the server's
>From: Jeff Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Mersenne: Milestones?
>Date: Tue, 09 May 2000 12:37:31 -0400
>
>We still have a handful of exponents to go.
I was looking at the server's assignments out pages. I guess the
assign
At 11:46 AM 5/9/00 -0400, you wrote:
>If the PrimeNet assignments reports are to be believed, we have
>double-checked all exponents through 3M and proven M(2976221) and
>M(3021377) to be respectively the 36th and 37th primes in numeric order.
We still have a handful of exponents to go.
The of
If the PrimeNet assignments reports are to be believed, we have
double-checked all exponents through 3M and proven M(2976221) and M(3021377)
to be respectively the 36th and 37th primes in numeric order.
Nathan
Get Your Pri
