Re: Mersenne: A few questions

1999-06-28 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Sun, Jun 27, 1999 at 09:08:15PM -0400, George Woltman wrote: Assuming they respond that the claim is all in order, then we should be able to announce shortly thereafter. I'm keeping my fingers, toes and hairs crossed :-) Just too bad nobody else has participated in my guess-contest... That

RE: Mersenne: A few questions

1999-06-28 Thread Eric Hahn
How large will the exponent be for a 10,000,000 digit prime number? To be a 10,000,000 digit prime number the exponent must be at least 33,219,281 (which also happens to be a Mersenne candidate). Has the prime number that was found a week ago been announced on this list? I.E. What number was

Re: Mersenne: A few questions

1999-06-27 Thread Jud McCranie
At 12:14 PM 6/27/99 -0400, Geoffrey Faivre-Malloy wrote: How large will the exponent be for a 10,000,000 digit prime number? digits x 3.32192 gives the approximate exponent. +--+ | Jud "program first and think later" McCranie |

Re: Mersenne: A few questions

1999-06-27 Thread Jeff Woods
At 12:14 PM 6/27/99 -0400, you wrote: How large will the exponent be for a 10,000,000 digit prime number? P will be over 33,000,000 or roughly thereabouts. I'm sure someone can give a more precise number. Has the prime number that was found a week ago been announced on this list? I.E. What

RE: Mersenne: A few questions

1999-06-27 Thread Robert Clark
George has announced that the number that was suspected prime has been confirmed to be prime by different hardware and algorithms. Because of the EFF award money rules, we "GIMPS at large" will not be permitted to know what the exponent was, or who discovered it, until an article has