RE: Mersenne: K7 vs. x86

1999-08-23 Thread Willmore, David
> From: Brian J. Beesley [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > This is _still_ remarkable, since the "consumer" Athlons starting to > trickle onto the market have 64-bit 100 MHz FSB and 512KB L2 cache, > like PII / PIII / Xeon, but run their L2 cache at only 1/3 clock > speed (c.f. full clock speed for Xe

RE: Mersenne: K7 vs. x86

1999-08-23 Thread Brian J. Beesley
On 22 Aug 99, at 21:30, Aaron Blosser wrote: > But as we can see from the real world benchmarks, even though the Athlon > still does better, clock for clock, than a PIII, the difference isn't as > great (only ~107% faster on Winbench 99 FPU Winmark). The benchmark was > done with a PIII Xeon wit

RE: Mersenne: K7 vs. x86

1999-08-23 Thread Willmore, David
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > 1) The K7 has essentially the same ultra-high-performance bus as the > Alpha 21264, which I believe is 128 bits wide and runs at 200MHz, thus > is capable of feeding the hungry processor with significantly more data; > Sorry, system data bus fr

Re: Mersenne: K7 vs. x86

1999-08-22 Thread Jason Stratos Papadopoulos
On Sun, 22 Aug 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > For example, a typical complex radix-16 FFT pass in my Mlucas code > takes 16 complex data (32 8-byte floats), and including multiplies by > "twiddle" factors (FFT sincos data) does 168 FADDs and 88 FMULs on them- > that's nearly twice as many adds a

RE: Mersenne: K7 vs. x86

1999-08-22 Thread Aaron Blosser
> 2) The K7 has 3 functional units in its FPU, compared to just two for > every other high-end microprocessor I am aware of. All high-end processors > have a floating adder and multiplier. I'm not sure what the third unit on > the K7 does, but I suspect it's either a second floating adder, or perh