On Mon, 16 Apr 2001 18:53:33 +0200, Martijn Kruithof wrote:
>
>Hello,
>
>if that what you describe is the problem the solution is obvious
>If a client checked out an (set of) exponent(s) and has not returned it yet
>just re-assign that same (set of) exponent(s).
The problem is that the two machi
Hello,
if that what you describe is the problem the solution is obvious
If a client checked out an (set of) exponent(s) and has not returned it yet
just re-assign that same (set of) exponent(s).
It could also be that some user does this on purpose for instance someone
with
5 machines behind a f
There should, at the least, be some "anti-whammy" protection against the
same machine requesting more #'s than it could reasonably handle in a
certain time period (2 years is more than generous, I'd think).
We've seen this before, have we not? Misconfigured scripts of some sort
which keep retrie
