This is used to implement GLSL's atomicCounter() intrinsic. Previously
it *worked*, but the disassembly was bogus.
Signed-off-by: Chris Forbes
---
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_disasm.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_disasm.c
b/src/mesa/drivers
Signed-off-by: Chris Forbes
---
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_buffer_objects.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_buffer_objects.c
b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_buffer_objects.c
index 3532de6..81cc3bb 100644
--- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965
Signed-off-by: Chris Forbes
---
src/mesa/main/bufferobj.c | 1 +
src/mesa/main/mtypes.h| 1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/mesa/main/bufferobj.c b/src/mesa/main/bufferobj.c
index c92056a..d648308 100644
--- a/src/mesa/main/bufferobj.c
+++ b/src/mesa/main/bufferobj.c
@@ -
This would have *almost never* actually been an issue, since other state
tends to get flagged at the same time as new ABOs -- but still bogus.
Signed-off-by: Chris Forbes
---
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_wm_surface_state.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/
This is a followup to the UBO/TexBO flagging changes, and fixes similar problems
with atomic counter buffers.
Patches 1 & 2 have been sent before, but in a series with a completely
bogus final patch so didn't go anywhere.
Patches 3 & 4 are new, and fix the new piglit test
"arb_shader_atomic_coun
On Sun, 2014-10-12 at 01:56 +0300, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> Jan Vesely writes:
>
> > On Sat, 2014-10-11 at 12:47 +0300, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> >> Jan Vesely writes:
> >>
> >> > On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 18:02 +0300, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> >> >> Jan Vesely writes:
> >> >>
> >> >> > [SNIP]
> >>
On Sun, 2014-10-12 at 01:56 +0300, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> Jan Vesely writes:
>
> > On Sat, 2014-10-11 at 12:47 +0300, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> >> Jan Vesely writes:
> >>
> >> > On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 18:02 +0300, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> >> >> Jan Vesely writes:
> >> >>
> >> >> > [SNIP]
> >>
EdB writes:
> Sorry, I didn't test it enought.
> It needs the two following patch in order to work ok
>
> EdB (2):
> clover: add allow_empty_tag
> clover: don't return CL_INVALID_VALUE if there is no header
>
These look good,
Reviewed-by: Francisco Jerez
> src/gallium/state_trackers/clove
Jan Vesely writes:
> On Sat, 2014-10-11 at 12:47 +0300, Francisco Jerez wrote:
>> Jan Vesely writes:
>>
>> > On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 18:02 +0300, Francisco Jerez wrote:
>> >> Jan Vesely writes:
>> >>
>> >> > [SNIP]
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > > I also don't like that this way there is no difference
Suppresses a bunch of warning noise about sample_map possibly being used
uninitialized.
Signed-off-by: Chris Forbes
---
src/mesa/drivers/common/meta_blit.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/common/meta_blit.c
b/src/mesa/drivers/common/meta_blit.c
index c6616d9
On Sat, 2014-10-11 at 12:47 +0300, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> Jan Vesely writes:
>
> > On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 18:02 +0300, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> >> Jan Vesely writes:
> >>
> >> > [SNIP]
> >> >> >
> >> >> > > I also don't like that this way there is no difference between
> >> >> > > explicit an
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61527
bjarn...@rhi.hi.is changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bjarn...@rhi.hi.is
--- Comment #2 fr
---
src/gallium/state_trackers/clover/api/program.cpp | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/gallium/state_trackers/clover/api/program.cpp
b/src/gallium/state_trackers/clover/api/program.cpp
index 1b9311f..e3ef8d0 100644
--- a/src/gallium/state_trackers/clover/api
Sorry, I didn't test it enought.
It needs the two following patch in order to work ok
EdB (2):
clover: add allow_empty_tag
clover: don't return CL_INVALID_VALUE if there is no header
src/gallium/state_trackers/clover/api/program.cpp | 2 +-
src/gallium/state_trackers/clover/core/object.hpp
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84894
shillshoc...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84894
--- Comment #1 from shillshoc...@gmail.com ---
Turns out that it's a LightDM issue. Problem is solved by reverting to
lightdm-1:1.10.1-3-x86_64
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84894
Anael changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nana...@gmail.com
--
You are receiving this mai
Jan Vesely writes:
> On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 18:02 +0300, Francisco Jerez wrote:
>> Jan Vesely writes:
>>
>> > [SNIP]
>> >> >
>> >> > > I also don't like that this way there is no difference between
>> >> > > explicit and implicit kernel arguments. On the other hand it's simple,
>> >> > > and do
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 8:44 PM, Olivier Galibert wrote:
> Applied.
Thanks :)
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
On Friday 10 October 2014 15:45:51 Tom Stellard wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 07:51:40PM +0200, EdB wrote:
> > On Friday 10 October 2014 10:16:08 Tom Stellard wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 09:22:46PM +0200, EdB wrote:
> > > > On Thursday, October 09, 2014 06:29:40 AM Tom Stellard wrote:
>
20 matches
Mail list logo
