Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/2] i965: Context aware user space EU control through application

> -Original Message- > From: Landwerlin, Lionel G > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2018 10:24 PM > To: Marathe, Yogesh ; Chris Wilson wilson.co.uk>; Muthukumar, Aravindan ; > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Diwakar, Praveen > Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/2]

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/2] i965: Context aware user space EU control through application

Lionel, Chris, > -Original Message- > From: mesa-dev [mailto:mesa-dev-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf > Of Lionel Landwerlin > Sent: Friday, July 20, 2018 3:31 PM > To: Chris Wilson ; Muthukumar, Aravindan > ; mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/2]

[Mesa-dev] Proposing an extension to mesa

Hi, We want to propose an extension to mesa (GL & EGL), is there a separate way to do this or that's though RFC and patches on this list here? We have implemented it for i965 but we believe it can be used for other drivers as well. Please let us know. Regards, Yogesh.

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] egl/x11: Move dri2_format_for_depth prototype.

> -Original Message- > From: Engestrom, Eric > Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2018 7:48 PM > To: Marathe, Yogesh > Cc: Vinson Lee ; Daniel Stone > ; Emil Velikov ; Eric > Engestrom ; ML mesa-dev d...@lists.freedesktop.org> > Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] egl/x11:

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] egl/x11: Move dri2_format_for_depth prototype.

Hi Vinson, Eric, > -Original Message- > From: mesa-dev [mailto:mesa-dev-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf > Of Vinson Lee > Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2018 1:34 PM > To: Engestrom, Eric > Cc: Daniel Stone ; Emil Velikov > ; Eric Engestrom ; Marathe, >

Re: [Mesa-dev] [AppVeyor] mesa master #6216 failed

Thanks Ilia. >-Original Message- >From: ibmir...@gmail.com [mailto:ibmir...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Ilia Mirkin >Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2017 10:11 AM >To: Marathe, Yogesh <yogesh.mara...@intel.com> >Cc: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org; Muthukumar, Aravinda

Re: [Mesa-dev] [AppVeyor] mesa master #6216 failed

Don't know if this is a concern. The patch was built & tested with intel mesa CI and locally. Does this need attention or can be ignored? Please advise. -Yogesh. >From: mesa-dev [mailto:mesa-dev-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On >Behalf Of AppVeyor >Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2017 4:23 AM

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v2] i965 : optimized bucket index calculation

Ian, Rest all review comments noted, we'll get back, Thanks. >-Original Message- >From: mesa-dev [mailto:mesa-dev-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of >Ian Romanick >Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 9:51 AM >To: Muthukumar, Aravindan ; mesa- >>

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] mesa: use simple mtx in core mesa

Hi Timothy, >-Original Message- >From: mesa-dev [mailto:mesa-dev-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of >Timothy Arceri >Sent: Monday, October 16, 2017 6:30 AM >To: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org >Cc: Timothy Arceri >Subject: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] mesa:

Re: [Mesa-dev] Testing out Kristian's fast mtx patch

this out anyways, I should still try this. -Yogesh. >-Original Message- >From: Palli, Tapani >Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 2:37 PM >To: Timothy Arceri <tarc...@itsqueeze.com>; mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org >Cc: Marathe, Yogesh <yogesh.mara...@intel.com> >Subje

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v2] i965 : optimized bucket index calculation

+ all v1 reviewers. Does this look ok? -Yogesh. >-Original Message- >From: mesa-dev [mailto:mesa-dev-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of >aravindan.muthuku...@intel.com >Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 12:13 PM >To: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org >Cc: Muthukumar, Aravindan

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 3/3] egl/android: Use per surface out fence

Hi Emil, as discussed, we are leaving this at 3/3 split you've created. I've marked my earlier series "Not Applicable" in patchwork. Thanks. -Yogesh. >-Original Message- >From: mesa-dev [mailto:mesa-dev-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of >Emil Velikov >Sent: Friday, September

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 3/3] egl: dri3 changes to support surface primitive wrap around dri2

>-Original Message- >From: mesa-dev [mailto:mesa-dev-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of >Emil Velikov >Sent: Friday, September 15, 2017 10:00 PM >To: Marathe, Yogesh <yogesh.mara...@intel.com> >Cc: ML mesa-dev <mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org> >S

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/3] egl: Wrap dri3 surface primitive around dri2 egl surface

Hi Emil, >-Original Message- >From: Emil Velikov [mailto:emil.l.veli...@gmail.com] >Sent: Friday, September 15, 2017 9:52 PM >To: Marathe, Yogesh <yogesh.mara...@intel.com> >Cc: Eric Engestrom <eric.engest...@imgtec.com>; mesa- >d...@lists.freedesktop.org >

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/3] egl: Wrap dri3 surface primitive around dri2 egl surface

Hi Eric, >-Original Message- >From: Eric Engestrom [mailto:eric.engest...@imgtec.com] >Sent: Friday, September 15, 2017 7:13 PM >To: Marathe, Yogesh <yogesh.mara...@intel.com> >Cc: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org >Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/3] egl: Wrap dri3

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] i965 : optimized bucket index calculation

>-Original Message- >From: Matt Turner [mailto:matts...@gmail.com] > >On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Ian Romanick <i...@freedesktop.org> wrote: >> On 09/12/2017 02:40 AM, Marathe, Yogesh wrote: >>> Hi Jason, >>> >>> >>> >&g

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] i965 : optimized bucket index calculation

Hi Jason, On the asserts you’ve mentioned below, I assume we need to add them after ‘bufmgr->num_buckets++’ in add_bucket() as num_buckets could be 0 initially. Another clarification on ~1%, we meant approx. 1% there, that’s an improvement we saw in 3Dmark total not a degradation, we’ll

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v6.2] egl: Allow creation of per surface out fence

> -Original Message- > From: Emil Velikov [mailto:emil.l.veli...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, September 8, 2017 11:03 PM > To: Antognolli, Rafael > >> > > Isn't this strange? Can someone please comment? > >> > > > >> > In all fairness there was a few wtf moments

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v6.2] egl: Allow creation of per surface out fence

> -Original Message- > From: Emil Velikov [mailto:emil.l.veli...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, September 8, 2017 8:28 PM > To: Marathe, Yogesh <yogesh.mara...@intel.com> > Cc: Tomasz Figa <tf...@chromium.org>; Antognolli, Rafael > <rafael.antogno...@int

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v6.2] egl: Allow creation of per surface out fence

Hello Folks, Sorry for late reply, I took quite some time to CTS up, comments below. > -Original Message- > From: mesa-dev [mailto:mesa-dev-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf > Of Marathe, Yogesh > Sent: Friday, September 1, 2017 10:16 AM > To: Tomasz Figa <tf...@

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v6.2] egl: Allow creation of per surface out fence

Tomasz, > -Original Message- > From: mesa-dev [mailto:mesa-dev-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf > Of Tomasz Figa > Sent: Friday, September 1, 2017 9:53 AM > To: Marathe, Yogesh <yogesh.mara...@intel.com> > Cc: Gao, Shuo <shuo@intel.com>; Liu,

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v6.2] egl: Allow creation of per surface out fence

> -Original Message- > From: mesa-dev [mailto:mesa-dev-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf > Of Emil Velikov > Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 9:44 PM > To: Marathe, Yogesh <yogesh.mara...@intel.com> > Cc: Gao, Shuo <shuo@intel.com>; Liu, Zhiquan &

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v6.2] egl: Allow creation of per surface out fence

> -Original Message- > From: Emil Velikov [mailto:emil.l.veli...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 4:39 PM > To: Marathe, Yogesh <yogesh.mara...@intel.com> > Cc: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org; tf...@chromium.org; Gao, Shuo > <shuo@intel.

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v6.2] egl: Allow creation of per surface out fence

This still doesn't seem to be merged. Can someone please look at it? It does have Rbs. Regards, Yogesh. > -Original Message- > From: Marathe, Yogesh > Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 11:35 PM > To: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: tf...@chromium.org; emil.l.veli...

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v6.1] egl: Allow creation of per surface out fence

> -Original Message- > From: Tomasz Figa [mailto:tf...@chromium.org] > Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 8:17 PM > To: Marathe, Yogesh <yogesh.mara...@intel.com> > Cc: ML mesa-dev <mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>; Emil Velikov > <emil.l.veli...@gmail.co

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v6.1] egl: Allow creation of per surface out fence

> -Original Message- > From: mesa-dev [mailto:mesa-dev-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf > Of Emil Velikov > Sent: Monday, August 21, 2017 11:24 PM > To: Marathe, Yogesh <yogesh.mara...@intel.com> > Cc: Gao, Shuo <shuo@intel.com>; Liu, Zhiquan &

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v6.1] egl: Allow creation of per surface out fence

Can someone please comment on this? Are we done / still not done here? Regards, Yogesh. > -Original Message- > From: Marathe, Yogesh > Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 3:39 PM > To: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: tf...@chromium.org; emil.l.veli...@gmail.com; Ga

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] i965: Queue the buffer with a sync fence for Android OS

Tomasz, > -Original Message- > From: Tomasz Figa [mailto:tf...@chromium.org] > Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 5:29 PM > To: Marathe, Yogesh <yogesh.mara...@intel.com> > Hi Yogesh, > > On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 5:25 PM, Marathe, Yogesh > <yogesh.mara..

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] i965: Queue the buffer with a sync fence for Android OS

Hi Tomasz, > -Original Message- > From: mesa-dev [mailto:mesa-dev-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf > Of Tomasz Figa > Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2017 7:45 AM > To: Marathe, Yogesh <yogesh.mara...@intel.com> > >> > >> Changing the

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] i965: Queue the buffer with a sync fence for Android OS

Tomasz, > -Original Message- > From: mesa-dev [mailto:mesa-dev-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf > Of Tomasz Figa > Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2017 7:43 AM > To: Marathe, Yogesh <yogesh.mara...@intel.com> > On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Marathe, Yogesh >

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] i965: Queue the buffer with a sync fence for Android OS

> -Original Message- > > Tomasz, > > > -Original Message- > > From: Tomasz Figa [mailto:tf...@chromium.org] > > Sent: Saturday, August 5, 2017 8:47 AM > > > > Hi Yogesh, > > > > On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 1:22 AM, Ma

Re: [Mesa-dev] [EGL android: accquire fence implementation 1/2] i965: Return the last fence if the batch buffer is empty and nothing to be flushed when _intel_batchbuffer_flush_fence.

> -Original Message- > From: Wu, Zhongmin > Sent: Monday, August 7, 2017 11:27 AM > To: Marathe, Yogesh <yogesh.mara...@intel.com>; Tomasz Figa > <tf...@chromium.org> > Cc: Gao, Shuo <shuo@intel.com>; Antognolli, Rafael > <rafael.antogn

Re: [Mesa-dev] [EGL android: accquire fence implementation 1/2] i965: Return the last fence if the batch buffer is empty and nothing to be flushed when _intel_batchbuffer_flush_fence.

This can be dropped. I'm running with egl patch alone and things seem fine. Zhongmin, please comment if you don’t think so. > -Original Message- > From: mesa-dev [mailto:mesa-dev-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf > Of Marathe, Yogesh > Sent: Friday, August 4,

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] i965: Queue the buffer with a sync fence for Android OS

Tomasz, > -Original Message- > From: Tomasz Figa [mailto:tf...@chromium.org] > Sent: Saturday, August 5, 2017 8:47 AM > > Hi Yogesh, > > On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 1:22 AM, Marathe, Yogesh <yogesh.mara...@intel.com> > wrote: > >> -Original Message

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] i965: Queue the buffer with a sync fence for Android OS

> -Original Message- > From: Tomasz Figa [mailto:tf...@chromium.org] > Sent: Friday, August 4, 2017 9:39 PM > On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 12:53 AM, Marathe, Yogesh > <yogesh.mara...@intel.com> wrote: > > Tomasz, Emil, > > > >> -Original Mess

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] i965: Queue the buffer with a sync fence for Android OS

Tomasz, Emil, > -Original Message- > From: Tomasz Figa [mailto:tf...@chromium.org] > Sent: Friday, August 4, 2017 6:54 PM > To: Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> > Cc: Marathe, Yogesh <yogesh.mara...@intel.com>; Antognolli, Rafael > <rafael.anto

Re: [Mesa-dev] [EGL android: accquire fence implementation 1/2] i965: Return the last fence if the batch buffer is empty and nothing to be flushed when _intel_batchbuffer_flush_fence.

Tomasz, > -Original Message- > From: Tomasz Figa [mailto:tf...@chromium.org] > Sent: Friday, August 4, 2017 3:48 PM > To: Marathe, Yogesh <yogesh.mara...@intel.com> > Cc: Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com>; Wu, Zhongmin > <zhongmin...@intel.co

Re: [Mesa-dev] [EGL android: accquire fence implementation 1/2] i965: Return the last fence if the batch buffer is empty and nothing to be flushed when _intel_batchbuffer_flush_fence.

olli, Rafael > <rafael.antogno...@intel.com>; Timothy Arceri <tarc...@itsqueeze.com>; > Marathe, Yogesh <yogesh.mara...@intel.com>; Tomasz Figa > <tf...@chromium.org>; Kenneth Graunke <kenn...@whitecape.org>; > Kondapally, Kalyan <kalyan.kondapa...@intel.com>; M

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] i965: Queue the buffer with a sync fence for Android OS

Tomasz, > -Original Message- > From: Tomasz Figa [mailto:tf...@chromium.org] > Sent: Friday, August 4, 2017 6:52 AM > To: Marathe, Yogesh <yogesh.mara...@intel.com> > Cc: Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com>; Gao, Shuo > <shuo@intel.com>;

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] i965: Queue the buffer with a sync fence for Android OS

Adding folks who were CCed for earlier versions. Hi Emil, few doubts and comments below. > -Original Message- > From: Tomasz Figa [mailto:tf...@chromium.org] > Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2017 7:19 PM > To: Marathe, Yogesh <yogesh.mara...@intel.com> > Cc: Emil

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] i965: Queue the buffer with a sync fence for Android OS

Emil, > -Original Message- > From: Emil Velikov [mailto:emil.l.veli...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2017 4:06 PM > To: Marathe, Yogesh <yogesh.mara...@intel.com> > Cc: ML mesa-dev <mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>; Wu, Zhongmin > <zhongmin...@in

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] i965: Avoids loop for buffer object availability in add_exec_bo

> > -Original Message- > > From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk] > > Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 2:30 PM > > To: Muthukumar, Aravindan <aravindan.muthuku...@intel.com>; mesa- > > d...@lists.freedesktop.org > > Cc: Marathe, Yog

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/2] i965: Queue the buffer with a sync fence for Android OS v4.2

com>; Liu, Zhiquan <zhiquan@intel.com>; > Daniel Stone <dani...@collabora.com>; emil.l.veli...@gmail.com; Eric > Engestrom <e...@engestrom.ch>; Marathe, Yogesh > <yogesh.mara...@intel.com>; tf...@chromium.org; Kondapally, Kalyan > <kalyan.kondapa...@

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] i965: Avoids loop for buffer object availability in add_exec_bo

> -Original Message- > From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk] > Sent: Friday, July 28, 2017 2:30 PM > To: Muthukumar, Aravindan <aravindan.muthuku...@intel.com>; mesa- > d...@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Marathe, Yogesh <yogesh.mara...@intel.

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/2] i965: Queue the buffer with a sync fence for Android OS v4.2

> -Original Message- > From: Emil Velikov [mailto:emil.l.veli...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 11:22 PM > To: Marathe, Yogesh <yogesh.mara...@intel.com> > Cc: Wu, Zhongmin <zhongmin...@intel.com>; ML mesa-dev d...@lists.freedesktop.org>; Kondap

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/2] i965: Queue the buffer with a sync fence for Android OS v4.2

Emil, > -Original Message- > From: Emil Velikov [mailto:emil.l.veli...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 7:46 PM > To: Wu, Zhongmin <zhongmin...@intel.com> > Cc: ML mesa-dev <mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>; Kondapally, Kalyan > <kalyan.konda

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH V3] i965 : Optimize atom state flag checks

om> > Cc: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org; Marathe, Yogesh > <yogesh.mara...@intel.com> > Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH V3] i965 : Optimize atom state flag checks > > On 07/21, aravindan.muthuku...@intel.com wrote: > >From: Aravindan Muthukumar <aravindan.muthuku...@intel.

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH V2] i965 : Optimize atom state flag checks

> Just some style comments, feel free to ignore them. > Both comments are relevant, will address them in V3. Thanks Lionel. > On 20/07/17 12:35, aravindan.muthuku...@intel.com wrote: > > From: Aravindan Muthukumar > > > > This patch improves CPI Rate(Cycles per

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH V2] i965 : Optimize atom state flag checks

> -Original Message- > From: Ian Romanick [mailto:i...@freedesktop.org] > Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 2:24 AM > To: Marathe, Yogesh <yogesh.mara...@intel.com>; Muthukumar, Aravindan > <aravindan.muthuku...@intel.com>; mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject:

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH V2] i965 : Optimize atom state flag checks

Ian, > -Original Message- > From: mesa-dev [mailto:mesa-dev-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf > Of Ian Romanick > Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 12:33 AM > To: Muthukumar, Aravindan ; mesa- > d...@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH V2] i965 : Optimize atom state flag checks

Francisco, > -Original Message- > From: Francisco Jerez [mailto:curroje...@riseup.net] > Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 12:21 AM > To: Marathe, Yogesh <yogesh.mara...@intel.com>; Muthukumar, Aravindan > <aravindan.muthuku...@intel.com>; mesa-dev@lists.freed

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH V2] i965 : Optimize atom state flag checks

Francisco, > -Original Message- > From: mesa-dev [mailto:mesa-dev-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf > Of Francisco Jerez > Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 10:51 PM > To: Muthukumar, Aravindan ; mesa- > d...@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Muthukumar,

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] i965 : Performance Improvement

> > On 14.07.2017 09:38, Marathe, Yogesh wrote: > [...] > >>>> The only reason I could see this helping is if check_state() wasn't > >>>> inlined, but a release build with -O2 definitely inlines both > >>>> check_and_emit_atom() and check_state()

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] i965 : Performance Improvement

> -Original Message- > From: Kenneth Graunke [mailto:kenn...@whitecape.org] > Sent: Friday, July 14, 2017 11:20 AM > To: Marathe, Yogesh <yogesh.mara...@intel.com> > Cc: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org; Muthukumar, Aravindan > <aravindan.muthuku...@intel.co

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] i965 : Performance Improvement

Kenneth, > -Original Message- > From: mesa-dev [mailto:mesa-dev-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf > Of Kenneth Graunke > Sent: Friday, July 14, 2017 10:05 AM > To: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Muthukumar, Aravindan > Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev]

Re: [Mesa-dev] [EGL android: accquire fence implementation] i965: Queue the buffer with a sync fence for Android OS

> -Original Message- > From: mesa-dev [mailto:mesa-dev-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf > Of Tomasz Figa > Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 9:59 PM > To: Marathe, Yogesh <yogesh.mara...@intel.com> > Cc: Gao, Shuo <shuo@intel.com>; Liu, Zhiquan <zhi

Re: [Mesa-dev] [EGL android: accquire fence implementation] i965: Queue the buffer with a sync fence for Android OS

..@intel.com>; Liu, Zhiquan <zhiquan@intel.com>; > ML mesa-dev <mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>; Emil Velikov > <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com>; Chad Versace <chadvers...@chromium.org>; Eric > Engestrom <e...@engestrom.ch>; Marathe, Yogesh > <yogesh.mara..

Re: [Mesa-dev] [EGL android: accquire fence implementation] i965: Queue the buffer with a sync fence for Android OS

Hello Emil, My two cents since I too spent some time on this. > -Original Message- > From: mesa-dev [mailto:mesa-dev-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf > Of Emil Velikov > Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:41 PM > To: Wu, Zhongmin > Cc: Widawsky, Benjamin

Re: [Mesa-dev] Explicit sync tests on android

] On Behalf Of Marathe, Yogesh Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 3:50 PM To: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: [Mesa-dev] Explicit sync tests on android Hi Rob, Is there any test other than _flatland_ on android with which we can confirm explicit sync support? Regards, Yogesh

[Mesa-dev] Explicit sync tests on android

Hi Rob, Is there any test other than _flatland_ on android with which we can confirm explicit sync support can be verified? Regards, Yogesh. ___ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org

Re: [Mesa-dev] egl/android: fence_fd being forced to -1

> -Original Message- > From: Chad Versace [mailto:chadvers...@chromium.org] > On Tue 20 Jun 2017, Marathe, Yogesh wrote: > > > > From the framework's perspective, at least from the comments in > > > aosp://system/core/include/system/window.h [1], it's leg

Re: [Mesa-dev] egl/android: fence_fd being forced to -1

> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Eric Engestrom > > > > <eric.engest...@imgtec.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thursday, 2017-06-15 13:27:06 +, Marathe, Yogesh wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > &g

Re: [Mesa-dev] egl/android: fence_fd being forced to -1

Hello Chad, Any comments from you on this topic? Regards, Yogesh. > -Original Message- > > > > On Thursday, 2017-06-15 13:27:06 +, Marathe, Yogesh wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I'm tyring to run flatland native app on android. It app

Re: [Mesa-dev] egl/android: fence_fd being forced to -1

> -Original Message- > From: Eric Engestrom [mailto:eric.engest...@imgtec.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 7:30 PM > To: Marathe, Yogesh <yogesh.mara...@intel.com> > Cc: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org; Chad Versace > <chadvers...@chromium.org>; Palli,

Re: [Mesa-dev] egl/android: fence_fd being forced to -1

> -Original Message- > From: Emil Velikov [mailto:emil.l.veli...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 7:24 PM > To: Marathe, Yogesh <yogesh.mara...@intel.com> > Cc: mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: Re: [Mesa-dev] egl/android: fence_fd being forced to

[Mesa-dev] egl/android: fence_fd being forced to -1

Hello, I'm tyring to run flatland native app on android. It apparantly fails because of a fence issue. while debuging further it is observed that droid_window_enqueue_buffer() is forcing fence_fd =-1. Whats the expectation here if app wants to use fence sync? If we want to have this native

Re: [Mesa-dev] i965: disable_throttling

Hi, > -Original Message- > Hi, > > On 09.06.2017 09:21, Marathe, Yogesh wrote: > > I’m looking forward to set this brw->disable_throttling to true, I’m > > actually observing adverse effect on performance benchmarks after I > > force set that to

[Mesa-dev] i965: disable_throttling

Hi, I'm looking forward to set this brw->disable_throttling to true, I'm actually observing adverse effect on performance benchmarks after I force set that to true. What's the expectation from disable_throttling here? BTW, this is on android. Regards, Yogesh.