https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107351
Samuel Pitoiset changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107351
--- Comment #15 from Mauro Rossi ---
Hi Bas,
the problem is not happening anymore,
in both mesa 18.2 and 18.3 branches.
The bug report can be closed.
Mauro
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are the Q
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107351
--- Comment #14 from Mauro Rossi ---
Created attachment 140879
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=140879&action=edit
Hack test case that avoids the segfault
Hi Bas,
I (truly) don't know how this was possible, because it is al
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107351
--- Comment #13 from Mauro Rossi ---
Hi,
but the sequence of ALOGD customized LOG_TAG RADV log does tell that the line
invoking pAllocator argument was the first not being executed, and thus is
involved in the segfault,
could you please give a
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107351
--- Comment #12 from Bas Nieuwenhuizen ---
Note that *pCreateInfo and *gralloc_info are structs, not integers so printing
them this way is not very useful, since you are missing most of the data (also
gralloc_info is a pointer, printing that is
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107351
--- Comment #11 from Mauro Rossi ---
Hi Bas,
thanks for your instructions
I've tracked the line crashing in the radv_image.c file in master branch
utente@utente-MS-7576:~/oreo-x86_hwc1$ addr2line -Cfe
out/target/product/x86_64/symbols/system/
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107351
--- Comment #10 from Bas Nieuwenhuizen ---
If you're in a position to get more useful info, it would be great if you could
dump the *pCreateInfo arg of the crashing radv_CreateImage.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Conta
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107351
--- Comment #9 from Bas Nieuwenhuizen ---
Yes, images not explicitly using the path for Android cross-api interop should
just follow the normal path.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are the QA Cont
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107351
--- Comment #8 from Mauro Rossi ---
In the code between ANDROID braces, is it correct that code falls through in
case of !gralloc_info or should it bail out?
Just a question as I may be very wrong and confused
#ifdef ANDROID
const VkNative
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107351
--- Comment #7 from Bas Nieuwenhuizen ---
Looking at the full backtrace it looks like plain texture creation, nothing
Android specific so I'll need to debug the specific app sometime.
07-22 21:31:16.071 5007 5007 F DEBUG : backtrace:
07-22
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107351
--- Comment #6 from Mauro Rossi ---
Created attachment 140802
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=140802&action=edit
extended logcat to see what happens before and after
extended logcat to see what happens before and after
--
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107351
--- Comment #5 from Mauro Rossi ---
>Is ANDROID properly defined?
Yes, because it is defined by the build system itself,
without need of passing the LOCAL_CFLAGS := -DANDROID
Mauro
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assigne
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107351
--- Comment #4 from Bas Nieuwenhuizen ---
No, on ANDROID, the call to radv_image_from_gralloc should happen for wsi
images and wsi_info should be always NULL.
Is ANDROID properly defined?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the as
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107351
--- Comment #3 from Mauro Rossi ---
Hi Bas,
the problem was obeserved in the last month, but the relevant parts
radv_image.c and radv_android.c did not change,
so anything between 3da693b and HEAD
the addr2line output is not always reliable in
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107351
--- Comment #2 from Bas Nieuwenhuizen ---
Do you have a hash of the upstream git version you based this on? (just so I
can see how the lines correlate in radv_image.c)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107351
--- Comment #1 from Mauro Rossi ---
Created attachment 140797
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=140797&action=edit
logcat of slingshot extreeme vulkan test
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for t
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107351
Bug ID: 107351
Summary: Android 8.1: radv segfault with 3Dmark vulkan
benchmarks
Product: Mesa
Version: git
Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS: other
17 matches
Mail list logo
