https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45420
Stephane Marchesin marche...@icps.u-strasbg.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45420
--- Comment #9 from Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org
2012-02-09 19:00:37 PST ---
This is broken. This is not valid C :-)
#if (LLVM_NATIVE_ARCH == X86 || LLVM_NATIVE_ARCH == X86Target)
Doesn't work with the C preprocessor. The
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45420
Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45420
José Fonseca jfons...@vmware.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45420
--- Comment #5 from José Fonseca jfons...@vmware.com 2012-02-01 03:45:04 PST
---
(In reply to comment #4)
Created attachment 56422 [details] [review]
Proposed fix for LLVM-2.7
I don't really know how to properly fix this for all targets,
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45420
--- Comment #6 from Vinson Lee v...@freedesktop.org 2012-02-01 22:12:50 PST
---
(In reply to comment #5)
The ability to build with LLVM-2.6 is still useful for now, as it is one of
the
most stable LLVM releases for us ever.
But the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45420
--- Comment #7 from Vinson Lee v...@freedesktop.org 2012-02-01 22:20:26 PST
---
(In reply to comment #4)
Created attachment 56422 [details] [review]
Proposed fix for LLVM-2.7
I don't really know how to properly fix this for all targets,
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45420
José Fonseca jfons...@vmware.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45420
Vinson Lee v...@freedesktop.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45420
ojab o...@ojab.ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #56357|0 |1
is obsolete|
10 matches
Mail list logo