[Mesa-dev] [Bug 76188] EGL_EXT_image_dma_buf_import fd ownership is incorrect

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76188 Emil Velikov emil.l.veli...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 76188] EGL_EXT_image_dma_buf_import fd ownership is incorrect

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76188 --- Comment #11 from Pekka Paalanen ppaala...@gmail.com --- Sent to Mesa-stable: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-stable/2014-September/001683.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 76188] EGL_EXT_image_dma_buf_import fd ownership is incorrect

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76188 Chad Versace chad.vers...@linux.intel.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ---

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 76188] EGL_EXT_image_dma_buf_import fd ownership is incorrect

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76188 --- Comment #9 from Pekka Paalanen ppaala...@gmail.com --- (In reply to comment #7) I do see risk in not cherry-picking the fix. If an app uses this extension with unfixed Mesa 10.2, then that app will leak file descriptors. Hmm, isn't it the

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 76188] EGL_EXT_image_dma_buf_import fd ownership is incorrect

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76188 --- Comment #8 from Matt Turner matts...@gmail.com --- (In reply to comment #7) I see little risk in cherry-picking the fix to stable branches. The fix is isolated and only *removes* code. I do see risk in not cherry-picking the fix. If an

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 76188] EGL_EXT_image_dma_buf_import fd ownership is incorrect

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76188 Topi Pohjolainen topi.pohjolai...@intel.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 76188] EGL_EXT_image_dma_buf_import fd ownership is incorrect

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76188 --- Comment #5 from Pekka Paalanen ppaala...@gmail.com --- Patches are now in Piglit and Mesa: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/piglit/commit/?id=f51d966f0610721a0947619950f43ddd4d29d42d

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 76188] EGL_EXT_image_dma_buf_import fd ownership is incorrect

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76188 --- Comment #4 from Pekka Paalanen ppaala...@gmail.com --- Hi, I have patches sent for fixing it: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2014-August/065137.html http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/piglit/2014-August/012029.html At

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 76188] EGL_EXT_image_dma_buf_import fd ownership is incorrect

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76188 Pekka Paalanen ppaala...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppaala...@gmail.com

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 76188] EGL_EXT_image_dma_buf_import fd ownership is incorrect

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76188 --- Comment #3 from veb...@hotmail.fr --- As an additional comment, I would like to add that glamor uses EGL_EXT_image_dma_buf_import with the new behaviour (actually I didn't know the spec was updated in December, but I knew the decision was

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 76188] EGL_EXT_image_dma_buf_import fd ownership is incorrect

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76188 --- Comment #1 from Gwenole Beauchesne gb.de...@gmail.com --- (In reply to comment #0) Version #6 of EGL_EXT_image_dma_buf_import changed the semantics of fd ownership. The EGL implementation no longer claims ownership of the fd. #6 (David

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 76188] EGL_EXT_image_dma_buf_import fd ownership is incorrect

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76188 --- Comment #2 from Gwenole Beauchesne gb.de...@gmail.com --- According to SVN log, the most approaching constant that could be checked would be EGL_EGLEXT_VERSION = 20140114. i.e. r20692 for the EXT_image_dma_buf_import spec, and r24760 for the

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 76188] EGL_EXT_image_dma_buf_import fd ownership is incorrect

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76188 Chad Versace chad.vers...@linux.intel.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|