https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98428
Emil Velikov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98428
Dennis Schridde changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||devuran...@gmx.net
--
You are receivi
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98428
Laurent carlier changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lordhea...@gmail.com
--
You are recei
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98428
--- Comment #17 from Darek ---
Segfault after
'0003-mesa-glapi-Clean-up-dlopening-glapi-as-we-are-buildi.patch'
---
$ weston
GL_EXT_copy_image GL_EXT_draw_elements_base_vertex
GL_EXT_polygon_offset_clamp GL_EXT_text
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98428
--- Comment #16 from NicolasChauvet ---
I went deeper in this issue assuming the real fix is to build glapi shared and
link to it anyway. (I'm not sure if there is any users that will find the
dlopening glapi only as needed useful over not buildi
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98428
--- Comment #15 from NicolasChauvet ---
Created attachment 128936
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=128936&action=edit
mesa: glapi: Clean-up dlopening glapi as we are building shared by default
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98428
--- Comment #14 from NicolasChauvet ---
Created attachment 128935
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=128935&action=edit
Revert "gbm: dlopen libglapi so gbm_create_device works"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are t
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98428
NicolasChauvet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #127532|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98428
Darek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dz1125.bug.trac...@gmail.co
|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98428
Eugene A. Shatokhin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eugene.shatok...@rosalab.ru
--
Yo
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98428
Jonathan Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jdie...@lesbg.com
--- Comment #12 from
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98428
--- Comment #11 from Kyle Brenneman ---
(In reply to Emil Velikov from comment #10)
> (In reply to Kyle Brenneman from comment #9)
> > > > > - And last but not least - reuse GLVND dispatch. For this we would
> > > > > need to
> > > > > convince
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98428
--- Comment #10 from Emil Velikov ---
(In reply to Kyle Brenneman from comment #9)
> > > > - And last but not least - reuse GLVND dispatch. For this we would
> > > > need to
> > > > convince Kyle that GLdisplatch.so can be accessible by vendors
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98428
Kyle Brenneman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kyle.brenne...@gmail.com
--
You are re
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98428
--- Comment #9 from Kyle Brenneman ---
> > > - And last but not least - reuse GLVND dispatch. For this we would need
> > > to
> > > convince Kyle that GLdisplatch.so can be accessible by vendors and it gets
> > > some ABI stability (note the GL
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98428
--- Comment #8 from ajax at nwnk dot net ---
(In reply to Ian Romanick from comment #7)
> So... how does it work if the linked libglapi and libGL provide different,
> incompatible implementations of, say, _glapi_set_dispatch?
Define "incompatibl
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98428
--- Comment #7 from Ian Romanick ---
So... how does it work if the linked libglapi and libGL provide different,
incompatible implementations of, say, _glapi_set_dispatch?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bu
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98428
--- Comment #6 from ajax at nwnk dot net ---
(In reply to Emil Velikov from comment #5)
> Are old xservers (ones which includes their own glapi dispatch) + glapi
> linked dri modules going to work ?
Who cares? Anyone still running 1.14 is alrea
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98428
--- Comment #5 from Emil Velikov ---
(In reply to ajax at nwnk dot net from comment #4)
> (In reply to Emil Velikov from comment #3)
> > On a more comprehensive note:
> >
> > One of the goals behind GLVND is to reuse mesa's GLAPI and allow us to
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98428
--- Comment #4 from ajax at nwnk dot net ---
(In reply to Emil Velikov from comment #3)
> On a more comprehensive note:
>
> One of the goals behind GLVND is to reuse mesa's GLAPI and allow us to drop
> our "copy". The latter seems to have dimini
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98428
--- Comment #3 from Emil Velikov ---
On a more comprehensive note:
One of the goals behind GLVND is to reuse mesa's GLAPI and allow us to drop our
"copy". The latter seems to have diminished and my attempts to get it back on
board have been shot
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98428
Emil Velikov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a...@nwnk.net,
|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98428
NicolasChauvet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||drink...@chromium.org
--- Comment #1 fr
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98428
Bug ID: 98428
Summary: Undefined non-weak-symbol in dri-drivers
Product: Mesa
Version: git
Hardware: Other
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
24 matches
Mail list logo
